138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28293504)
1. An Appraisal of Internal Mammary Artery Perforators as Recipient Vessels in Microvascular Breast Reconstruction-An Analysis of 515 Consecutive Cases.
Vollbach FH; Heitmann CD; Fansa H
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2016 Dec; 4(12):e1144. PubMed ID: 28293504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of Independent Risk Factors for Skin Complications in a Multifactorial Logistic Regression Analysis of Simultaneous Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction and Skin Reduction Mastectomy in Large and Ptotic Breasts Using an Inferiorly Based Deepithelialized Dermal Breast Flap.
Vollbach FH; Thomas BF; Fansa H
J Pers Med; 2022 Feb; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35330332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An outcome analysis comparing the thoracodorsal and internal mammary vessels as recipient sites for microvascular breast reconstruction: a prospective study of 100 patients.
Moran SL; Nava G; Behnam AB; Serletti JM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 May; 111(6):1876-82. PubMed ID: 12711947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The anatomic basis of the internal mammary artery perforator flap: a cadaver study.
Schmidt M; Aszmann OC; Beck H; Frey M
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Feb; 63(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 19121988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utilization of the internal mammary perforators as the recipient vessels for microsurgical breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.
Vourvachis M; Goodarzi MR; Scaglioni MF; Tartanus J; Jones A; Cheng HT; Abdelrahman M
Microsurgery; 2024 Jan; 44(1):e31105. PubMed ID: 37675648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microsurgical refinements with the use of internal mammary (IM) perforators as recipient vessels in transverse upper gracilis (TUG) autologous breast reconstruction.
Saour S; Libondi G; Ramakrishnan V
Gland Surg; 2017 Aug; 6(4):375-379. PubMed ID: 28861378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed tomographic angiography imaging and clinical implications of internal mammary artery perforator vessels as recipient vessels in autologous breast reconstruction.
Fansa H; Schirmer S; Cervelli A; Gehl HB
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(5):533-7. PubMed ID: 22868328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of using the internal mammary artery as a recipient vessel on medial mastectomy skin flap perfusion in autologous breast reconstruction: An observational study using indocyanine green.
Pruimboom T; Tuinder SMH; Qiu SS; Keuter XHA; van der Hulst RRWJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Sep; 84():350-356. PubMed ID: 37390544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Choice of recipient vessels in delayed TRAM flap breast reconstruction after radiotherapy.
Temple CL; Strom EA; Youssef A; Langstein HN
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Jan; 115(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 15622239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving outcomes in microsurgical breast reconstruction: lessons learnt from 406 consecutive DIEP/TRAM flaps performed by a single surgeon.
Damen TH; Morritt AN; Zhong T; Ahmad J; Hofer SO
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Aug; 66(8):1032-8. PubMed ID: 23642795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recipient vessels in free-flap breast reconstruction: a study of the internal mammary and thoracodorsal vessels.
Feng LJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Feb; 99(2):405-16. PubMed ID: 9030148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Color duplex assessment of 4th and 5th internal mammary artery perforators: the pedicles of the medially based lower pole breast flaps.
Abdel-Monem K; Elshahat A; Abou-Gamrah S; Eldin Abol-Atta H; Abd Eltawab R; Massoud K
Eplasty; 2012; 12():e4. PubMed ID: 22292100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.
Muto M; Satake T; Masuda Y; Kobayashi S; Tamura S; Kobayashi S; Ohtake T; Maegawa J
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 Feb; 8(2):e2660. PubMed ID: 32309101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Application of the Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Adipofascial Flap.
Nishimon M; Ohara H; Ohara K; Ogata H; Kishi K
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2019 Mar; 7(3):e2062. PubMed ID: 31044102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alternative venous outflow vessels in microvascular breast reconstruction.
Mehrara BJ; Santoro T; Smith A; Arcilla EA; Watson JP; Shaw WW; Da Lio AL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Aug; 112(2):448-55. PubMed ID: 12900602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.
Levine SM; Patel N; Disa JJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 22964681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Internal Mammary Artery and Vein Perforator Vessels as Troubleshooter Recipient Vessels.
Fansa H
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2019 Mar; 7(3):e2148. PubMed ID: 31044119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recipient vessel selection in immediate breast reconstruction with free abdominal tissue transfer after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
Yang SJ; Eom JS; Lee TJ; Ahn SH; Son BH
Arch Plast Surg; 2012 May; 39(3):216-21. PubMed ID: 22783529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perforator flap breast reconstruction using internal mammary perforator branches as a recipient site: an anatomical and clinical analysis.
Munhoz AM; Ishida LH; Montag E; Sturtz GP; Saito FL; Rodrigues L; Gemperli R; Ferreira MC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jul; 114(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 15220570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Usability of the internal mammary recipient vessels in microvascular breast reconstruction.
O'Neill AC; Hayward V; Zhong T; Hofer SO
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Jul; 69(7):907-11. PubMed ID: 27013145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
