These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28294188)

  • 1. Efficient digitalization method for dental restorations using micro-CT data.
    Kim C; Baek SH; Lee T; Go J; Kim SY; Cho S
    Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7():44577. PubMed ID: 28294188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy of microcomputed tomography-scanned half-arch impressions.
    Kerr M; Park N; Leeson D; Nikolskiy S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):797-802. PubMed ID: 30617030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods.
    Cho SH; Schaefer O; Thompson GA; Guentsch A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 25682531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Three-dimensional digital dental model based on micro-CT].
    Li YX; Bai YX; Wei CF
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 46(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 21418947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems.
    Shembesh M; Ali A; Finkelman M; Weber HP; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):581-586. PubMed ID: 26855068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of digital impression systems with intraoral scanners for fabricating restorations and fixed dental prostheses.
    Takeuchi Y; Koizumi H; Furuchi M; Sato Y; Ohkubo C; Matsumura H
    J Oral Sci; 2018; 60(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 29576569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel computer-aided method to fabricate a custom one-piece glass fiber dowel-and-core based on digitized impression and crown preparation data.
    Chen Z; Li Y; Deng X; Wang X
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):276-83. PubMed ID: 24118182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization.
    Güth JF; Runkel C; Beuer F; Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Keul C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1445-1455. PubMed ID: 27406138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct 3-D morphological measurements of silicone rubber impression using micro-focus X-ray CT.
    Kamegawa M; Nakamura M; Fukui Y; Tsutsumi S; Hojo M
    Dent Mater J; 2010 Jan; 29(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 20379015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT.
    Kim JH; Jeong JH; Lee JH; Cho HW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):551-557. PubMed ID: 27422237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of intraoral and extraoral digital data acquisition for dental restorations.
    Rudolph H; Salmen H; Moldan M; Kuhn K; Sichwardt V; Wöstmann B; Luthardt RG
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 27008261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations.
    Quaas S; Rudolph H; Luthardt RG
    J Dent; 2007 Dec; 35(12):903-8. PubMed ID: 17980951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment.
    Fasbinder DJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010; 31 Spec No 4():2-11; quiz 12. PubMed ID: 21049823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Detection of marginal leakage of Class V restorations in vitro by micro-CT].
    Gu LJ; Zhao XY; Li SB
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 47(9):534-7. PubMed ID: 23141726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology.
    Kachalia PR; Geissberger MJ
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2010 May; 38(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 20572526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental image replacement on cone beam computed tomography with three-dimensional optical scanning of a dental cast, occlusal bite, or bite tray impression.
    Kang SH; Lee JW; Lim SH; Kim YH; Kim MK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 43(10):1293-301. PubMed ID: 25015906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner.
    Flügge TV; Schlager S; Nelson K; Nahles S; Metzger MC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Sep; 144(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 23992820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optical impression systems for CAD-CAM restorations.
    Galhano GÁ; Pellizzer EP; Mazaro JV
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e575-9. PubMed ID: 23172483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.