155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28294484)
1. Interactive audience response systems in oral and maxillofacial radiology undergraduate lectures.
de Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C; Rodrigues CT; Domaneschi C; Caldeira Monteiro SA
Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 Feb; 22(1):e63-e69. PubMed ID: 28294484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Audience response systems in medical student education benefit learners and presenters.
Nayak L; Erinjeri JP
Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 18348839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of using an audience response system on learning, motivation and information retention in the orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over trial.
Dhaliwal HK; Allen M; Kang J; Bates C; Hodge T
J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 42(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 25849094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phone-based audience response system as an adjunct in orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over randomised controlled trial.
Alharbi F; Alazmi KF; El Momani BR; Al-Muzian L; Wertheimer M; Almukhtar A; Almuzian M
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Nov; 20(1):435. PubMed ID: 33198761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of an audience response system in a preclinical operative dentistry course.
Elashvili A; Denehy GE; Dawson DV; Cunningham MA
J Dent Educ; 2008 Nov; 72(11):1296-303. PubMed ID: 18981208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An audience response system may influence student performance on anatomy examination questions.
Hoyt A; McNulty JA; Gruener G; Chandrasekhar A; Espiritu B; Ensminger D; Price R; Naheedy R
Anat Sci Educ; 2010; 3(6):295-9. PubMed ID: 20890951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Audience response system: effect on learning in family medicine residents.
Schackow TE; Chavez M; Loya L; Friedman M
Fam Med; 2004; 36(7):496-504. PubMed ID: 15243831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of an audience response system on orthodontic knowledge retention of undergraduate dental students--a randomised control trial.
Robson N; Popat H; Richmond S; Farnell DJ
J Orthod; 2015; 42(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 26282015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Crossover trial of an audience response system application for smartphone in undergraduate medical students.
Lours C; Sujobert P
MedEdPublish (2016); 2018; 7():215. PubMed ID: 38074600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a blended learning course for teaching oral radiology to undergraduate dental students.
Kavadella A; Tsiklakis K; Vougiouklakis G; Lionarakis A
Eur J Dent Educ; 2012 Feb; 16(1):e88-95. PubMed ID: 22251359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What do dental students think about mandatory laptop programs?
Hendricson W; Eisenberg E; Guest G; Jones P; Johnson L; Panagakos F; McDonald J; Cintron L
J Dent Educ; 2006 May; 70(5):480-99. PubMed ID: 16687633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of a Heutagogical, Multimedia-Based Teaching Concept to Promote Self-Determined, Cooperative Student Learning in Clinical Radiology.
Teichgräber U; Ingwersen M; Mentzel HJ; Aschenbach R; Neumann R; Franiel T; Herzog AB; Böttcher J; Pfeil A; Mensel B; Kühnel C; Freesmeyer M; Fischer MR; Zottmann J
Rofo; 2021 Jun; 193(6):701-711. PubMed ID: 33327029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A case-based and team-based learning model in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
Kumar V; Gadbury-Amyot CC
J Dent Educ; 2012 Mar; 76(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 22383601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Students' attitudes towards and use of computer-assisted learning in oral radiology over a 10-year period.
Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Mar; 26(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 9442630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Interactive Online Approach to Teaching Evidence-Based Dentistry with Web 2.0 Technology.
Zheng M; Bender D; Reid L; Milani J
J Dent Educ; 2017 Aug; 81(8):995-1003. PubMed ID: 28765444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A controlled study of improvements in student exam performance with the use of an audience response system during medical school lectures.
Stoddard HA; Piquette CA
Acad Med; 2010 Oct; 85(10 Suppl):S37-40. PubMed ID: 20881700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do questions help? The impact of audience response systems on medical student learning: a randomised controlled trial.
Mains TE; Cofrancesco J; Milner SM; Shah NG; Goldberg H
Postgrad Med J; 2015 Jul; 91(1077):361-7. PubMed ID: 26045510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A pilot study to evaluate the use of virtual lectures for undergraduate radiology teaching.
Sendra-Portero F; Torales-Chaparro OE; Ruiz-Gómez MJ; Martínez-Morillo M
Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):888-93. PubMed ID: 23434454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Introduction of e-learning in dental radiology reveals significantly improved results in final examination.
Meckfessel S; Stühmer C; Bormann KH; Kupka T; Behrends M; Matthies H; Vaske B; Stiesch M; Gellrich NC; Rücker M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 39(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 20452231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utilizing Audience Response to Foster Evidence-based Learning in a Pilot Study: Does It Really Work?
Awan O; Dako F; Akhter T; Hava S; Shaikh F; Ali S; Chang P
Cureus; 2018 Dec; 10(12):e3799. PubMed ID: 30868013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
