156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28294484)
21. Using Twitter for Teaching and Learning in an Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Course.
Gonzalez SM; Gadbury-Amyot CC
J Dent Educ; 2016 Feb; 80(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 26834132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Development of a mobile device optimized cross platform-compatible oral pathology and radiology spaced repetition system for dental education.
Al-Rawi W; Easterling L; Edwards PC
J Dent Educ; 2015 Apr; 79(4):439-47. PubMed ID: 25838016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback.
Cain J; Black EP; Rohr J
Am J Pharm Educ; 2009 Apr; 73(2):21. PubMed ID: 19513159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of Audience Response System in Enhancing Teaching of Anatomy and Physiology for Health Sciences Students at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences.
Baashar A; Kumar RS; Akhtar SMI; Alyousif SM; Alhassan AI; Townsi N
Adv Med Educ Pract; 2023; 14():421-432. PubMed ID: 37139014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Audience-response systems for evaluation of pediatric lectures--comparison with a classic end-of-term online-based evaluation.
Bode SF; Straub C; Giesler M; Biller S; Forster J; Krüger M
GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2015; 32(2):Doc18. PubMed ID: 26038683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Use of remote response devices: an effective interactive method in the long- term learning.
Millor M; Etxano J; Slon P; García-Barquín P; Villanueva A; Bastarrika G; Pueyo JC
Eur Radiol; 2015 Mar; 25(3):894-900. PubMed ID: 25391633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The educational value of an audience response system use in an Iraqi medical school.
Tuma F; Majeed H; Blebea J; Nassar A; Durchholz WC; Schofield S
BMC Med Educ; 2022 Apr; 22(1):319. PubMed ID: 35473705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Teaching Radiographic Caries Detection and Treatment Planning: A Seminar Using an Audience Response System.
Young A; Skudutyte-Rysstad R; Torgersen G; Giertsen E
Caries Res; 2022; 56(3):226-233. PubMed ID: 35858539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The impact of an audience response system on a summative assessment, a controlled field study.
Schmidt T; Gazou A; Rieß A; Rieß O; Grundmann-Hauser K; Falb R; Schadeck M; Heinrich T; Abeditashi M; Schmidt J; Mau-Holzmann UA; Schnabel KP
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Jul; 20(1):218. PubMed ID: 32660496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Optimizing quality of dental carving by preclinical dental students through anatomy theory reinforcement.
de Azevedo RA; Correa MB; Torriani MA; Lund RG
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul; 11(4):377-384. PubMed ID: 29156108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Perceived relevance of oral biology by dental students.
Scheven BA
Eur J Dent Educ; 2012 Feb; 16(1):e64-72. PubMed ID: 22251356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of differing Audience Response System question types on student attention in the veterinary medical classroom.
Rush BR; Hafen M; Biller DS; Davis EG; Klimek JA; Kukanich B; Larson RL; Roush JK; Schermerhorn T; Wilkerson MJ; White BJ
J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 20576903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Audience response techniques for 21st century radiology education.
Richardson ML
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jul; 21(7):834-41. PubMed ID: 24833568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of Video Triggering During Conventional Lectures on Final Grades of Dental Students in an Oral Biology Course: A Two-Year Retrospective Study.
Farooq I; Al-Jandan BA
J Dent Educ; 2015 Dec; 79(12):1467-70. PubMed ID: 26632302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system.
Gauci SA; Dantas AM; Williams DA; Kemm RE
Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 19261762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Everyone's answering: using technology to increase classroom participation.
Filer D
Nurs Educ Perspect; 2010; 31(4):247-50. PubMed ID: 20882867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Team-based learning using an audience response system: an innovative method of teaching diagnosis to undergraduate dental students.
Pileggi R; O'Neill PN
J Dent Educ; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1182-8. PubMed ID: 18923099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The importance of student research projects in dental education.
Guven Y; Uysal O
Eur J Dent Educ; 2011 May; 15(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 21492344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Students' attitudes towards an on-line orthodontic learning resource.
Linjawi AL; Hamdan AM; Perryer DG; Walmsley AD; Hill KB
Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 May; 13(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 19368551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effectiveness of flipped classroom with Poll Everywhere as a teaching-learning method for pharmacy students.
Gubbiyappa KS; Barua A; Das B; Vasudeva Murthy CR; Baloch HZ
Indian J Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 48(Suppl 1):S41-S46. PubMed ID: 28031607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
