These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

500 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28294522)

  • 1. A quantitative screening-level approach to incorporate chemical exposure and risk into alternative assessment evaluations.
    Arnold SM; Greggs B; Goyak KO; Landenberger BD; Mason AM; Howard B; Zaleski RT
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):1007-1022. PubMed ID: 28294522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Qualitative approach to comparative exposure in alternatives assessment.
    Greggs W; Burns T; Egeghy P; Embry MR; Fantke P; Gaborek B; Heine L; Jolliet O; Lee C; Muir D; Plotzke K; Rinkevich J; Sunger N; Tanir JY; Whittaker M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Nov; 15(6):880-894. PubMed ID: 29917303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New approach to weight-of-evidence assessment of ecotoxicological effects in regulatory decision-making.
    Hall AT; Belanger SE; Guiney PD; Galay-Burgos M; Maack G; Stubblefield W; Martin O
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):573-579. PubMed ID: 28383801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A risk-based, product-level approach for assuring aquatic environmental safety of cleaning products in the context of sustainability: The Environmental Safety Check (ESC) scheme of the A.I.S.E. Charter for Sustainable Cleaning.
    Pickup JA; Dewaele J; Furmanski NL; Kowalczyk A; Luijkx GC; Mathieu S; Stelter N
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):127-138. PubMed ID: 26891423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.
    Dearfield KL; Gollapudi BB; Bemis JC; Benz RD; Douglas GR; Elespuru RK; Johnson GE; Kirkland DJ; LeBaron MJ; Li AP; Marchetti F; Pottenger LH; Rorije E; Tanir JY; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Yauk CL; Zeiger E; Luijten M
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Jun; 58(5):264-283. PubMed ID: 27650663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ecotoxicological hazard and risk assessment of endocrine active substances.
    Leopold A; Roberts M; Matthiessen P
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):264-266. PubMed ID: 27862919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the relevance of ecotoxicological studies for regulatory decision making.
    Rudén C; Adams J; Ågerstrand M; Brock TC; Poulsen V; Schlekat CE; Wheeler JR; Henry TR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):652-663. PubMed ID: 27599457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the reliability of ecotoxicological studies: An overview of current needs and approaches.
    Moermond C; Beasley A; Breton R; Junghans M; Laskowski R; Solomon K; Zahner H
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jul; 13(4):640-651. PubMed ID: 27869364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative evaluation of five hazard screening tools.
    Panko JM; Hitchcock K; Fung M; Spencer PJ; Kingsbury T; Mason AM
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):139-154. PubMed ID: 26777143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When Are Adverse Outcome Pathways and Associated Assays "Fit for Purpose" for Regulatory Decision-Making and Management of Chemicals?
    Coady K; Browne P; Embry M; Hill T; Leinala E; Steeger T; Maślankiewicz L; Hutchinson T
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Jul; 15(4):633-647. PubMed ID: 30908812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developing Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) for shampoos: The basis for comparable life cycle assessment.
    Golsteijn L; Lessard L; Campion JF; Capelli A; D'Enfert V; King H; Kremer J; Krugman M; Orliac H; Furnemont SR; Schuh W; Stalmans M; O'Hanlon NW; Coroama M
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Sep; 14(5):649-659. PubMed ID: 29870121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current limitations and recommendations to improve testing for the environmental assessment of endocrine active substances.
    Coady KK; Biever RC; Denslow ND; Gross M; Guiney PD; Holbech H; Karouna-Renier NK; Katsiadaki I; Krueger H; Levine SL; Maack G; Williams M; Wolf JC; Ankley GT
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):302-316. PubMed ID: 27791330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advancing alternatives assessment for safer chemical substitution: A research and practice agenda.
    Tickner J; Jacobs M; Malloy T; Buck T; Stone A; Blake A; Edwards S
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Nov; 15(6):855-866. PubMed ID: 30117284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recommended approaches to the scientific evaluation of ecotoxicological hazards and risks of endocrine-active substances.
    Matthiessen P; Ankley GT; Biever RC; Bjerregaard P; Borgert C; Brugger K; Blankinship A; Chambers J; Coady KK; Constantine L; Dang Z; Denslow ND; Dreier DA; Dungey S; Gray LE; Gross M; Guiney PD; Hecker M; Holbech H; Iguchi T; Kadlec S; Karouna-Renier NK; Katsiadaki I; Kawashima Y; Kloas W; Krueger H; Kumar A; Lagadic L; Leopold A; Levine SL; Maack G; Marty S; Meador J; Mihaich E; Odum J; Ortego L; Parrott J; Pickford D; Roberts M; Schaefers C; Schwarz T; Solomon K; Verslycke T; Weltje L; Wheeler JR; Williams M; Wolf JC; Yamazaki K
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):267-279. PubMed ID: 28127947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frameworks for screening and risk management of chemicals and advanced materials: A critical review.
    Moore DW; Ruffle B; McQueen A; Thakali S; Edwards D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2023 Sep; 19(5):1192-1206. PubMed ID: 35112493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Population-relevant endpoints in the evaluation of endocrine-active substances (EAS) for ecotoxicological hazard and risk assessment.
    Marty MS; Blankinship A; Chambers J; Constantine L; Kloas W; Kumar A; Lagadic L; Meador J; Pickford D; Schwarz T; Verslycke T
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Mar; 13(2):317-330. PubMed ID: 28052490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lessons from the 2018 International Symposium on Alternatives Assessment: Advances and Reflections on Practice and Ongoing Needs to Build the Field.
    Tickner J; Simon R; Jacobs M; Rudisill C; Tanir J; Heine L; Spencer P; Fantke P; Malloy T; Edwards S; Zhou X
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Nov; 15(6):909-916. PubMed ID: 31535774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving substance information in USEtox
    Saouter E; Aschberger K; Fantke P; Hauschild MZ; Kienzler A; Paini A; Pant R; Radovnikovic A; Secchi M; Sala S
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Dec; 36(12):3463-3470. PubMed ID: 28671290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CERCLA-linked environmental impact and benefit analysis: Evaluating remedial alternatives for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site, Portland, Oregon, USA.
    McNally AD; Fitzpatrick AG; Mirchandani S; Salmon M; Edwards DA
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Jan; 14(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 29068521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.