These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28295088)

  • 1. Reduction of speckle noise in holographic images using spatial jittering in numerical reconstructions.
    Haouat M; Garcia-Sucerquia J; Kellou A; Picart P
    Opt Lett; 2017 Mar; 42(6):1047-1050. PubMed ID: 28295088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speckle reduction in digital holography with low-dimensional reconstruction.
    Lin W; Chen L; Cai W; Hu Y; Wen K
    Appl Opt; 2021 Feb; 60(5):1470-1475. PubMed ID: 33690593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital off-axis holographic interferometry with simulated wavefront.
    Belashov AV; Petrov NV; Semenova IV
    Opt Express; 2014 Nov; 22(23):28363-76. PubMed ID: 25402078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coherent noise reduction in digital holographic phase contrast microscopy by slightly shifting object.
    Pan F; Xiao W; Liu S; Wang F; Rong L; Li R
    Opt Express; 2011 Feb; 19(5):3862-9. PubMed ID: 21369211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimized Fresnel phase hologram for ringing artifacts removal in lensless holographic projection.
    Tian S; Chen L; Zhang H
    Appl Opt; 2022 Feb; 61(5):B17-B24. PubMed ID: 35201121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical pupil manipulation for speckle reduction in digital holographic microscopy.
    Buitrago-Duque C; Garcia-Sucerquia J
    Heliyon; 2021 Jan; 7(1):e06098. PubMed ID: 33553757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speckle noise reduction for digital holographic images using multi-scale convolutional neural networks.
    Jeon W; Jeong W; Son K; Yang H
    Opt Lett; 2018 Sep; 43(17):4240-4243. PubMed ID: 30160761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speckle-free digital holographic recording of a diffusely reflecting object.
    Kim YS; Kim T; Woo SS; Kang H; Poon TC; Zhou C
    Opt Express; 2013 Apr; 21(7):8183-9. PubMed ID: 23571908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Encoding multiple holograms for speckle-noise reduction in optical display.
    Memmolo P; Bianco V; Paturzo M; Javidi B; Netti PA; Ferraro P
    Opt Express; 2014 Oct; 22(21):25768-75. PubMed ID: 25401610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Refocus criterion based on maximization of the coherence factor in digital three-wavelength holographic interferometry.
    Picart P; Montresor S; Sakharuk O; Muravsky L
    Opt Lett; 2017 Jan; 42(2):275-278. PubMed ID: 28081091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speckle noise suppression in digital holography by angular diversity with phase-only spatial light modulator.
    Wang Y; Meng P; Wang D; Rong L; Panezai S
    Opt Express; 2013 Aug; 21(17):19568-78. PubMed ID: 24105504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Movies of cellular and sub-cellular motion by digital holographic microscopy.
    Mann CJ; Yu L; Kim MK
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Mar; 5():21. PubMed ID: 16556319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative study on a resampling mask method for speckle reduction with amplitude superposition.
    Zhang W; Cao L; Zhang H; Zhang H; Han C; Jin G; Sheng Y
    Appl Opt; 2017 May; 56(13):F205-F212. PubMed ID: 28463246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High topographical accuracy by optical shot noise reduction in digital holographic microscopy.
    León-Rodríguez M; Rodríguez-Vera R; Rayas JA; Calixto S
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Apr; 29(4):498-506. PubMed ID: 22472826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Random resampling masks: a non-Bayesian one-shot strategy for noise reduction in digital holography.
    Bianco V; Paturzo M; Memmolo P; Finizio A; Ferraro P; Javidi B
    Opt Lett; 2013 Mar; 38(5):619-21. PubMed ID: 23455243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling of speckle decorrelation in digital Fresnel holographic interferometry.
    Meteyer E; Foucart F; Pezerat C; Picart P
    Opt Express; 2021 Oct; 29(22):36180-36200. PubMed ID: 34809036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coherent noise reduction in digital holographic microscopy by averaging multiple holograms recorded with a multimode laser.
    Pan F; Yang L; Xiao W
    Opt Express; 2017 Sep; 25(18):21815-21825. PubMed ID: 29041474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speckle reduced lensless holographic projection from phase-only computer-generated hologram.
    Chang C; Qi Y; Wu J; Xia J; Nie S
    Opt Express; 2017 Mar; 25(6):6568-6580. PubMed ID: 28381004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-shot speckle reduction in numerical reconstruction of digitally recorded holograms.
    Hincapie D; Herrera-Ramírez J; Garcia-Sucerquia J
    Opt Lett; 2015 Apr; 40(8):1623-6. PubMed ID: 25872032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-shot speckle reduction in numerical reconstruction of digitally recorded holograms: comment.
    Maycock J; Hennelly B; McDonald J
    Opt Lett; 2015 Sep; 40(17):3953. PubMed ID: 26368684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.