258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28295395)
21. Three-layer heterogeneous mammographic phantoms for Monte Carlo simulation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.
Chang TY; Lai KJ; Tu CY; Wu J
Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2234. PubMed ID: 32042071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Monte Carlo model for mean glandular dose evaluation in spot compression mammography.
Sarno A; Dance DR; van Engen RE; Young KC; Russo P; Di Lillo F; Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Fei B; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3848-3860. PubMed ID: 28500759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in x-ray breast imaging: Part I - Macroscopic scales.
Massera RT; Tomal A; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1105-1116. PubMed ID: 38156766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mean glandular dose estimation using MCNPX for a digital breast tomosynthesis system with tungsten/aluminum and tungsten/aluminum+silver x-ray anode-filter combinations.
Ma AK; Darambara DG; Stewart A; Gunn S; Bullard E
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5278-89. PubMed ID: 19175087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Monte Carlo generated conversion factors for the estimation of average glandular dose in contact and magnification mammography.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5539-48. PubMed ID: 17047268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.
Boone JM; Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Shah N; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3767-76. PubMed ID: 16475776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography.
Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Yaffe M; Alm Carlsson G
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3143-52. PubMed ID: 15972986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radiation dose reduction for augmentation mammography.
Smathers RL; Boone JM; Lee LJ; Berns EA; Miller RA; Wright AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May; 188(5):1414-21. PubMed ID: 17449790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Estimated Average Glandular Dose for 1,828 Mammography Procedures in China: A Multicenter Study.
DU X; Wang J; Zhu BL
Biomed Environ Sci; 2019 Apr; 32(4):242-249. PubMed ID: 31217060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Real-time estimation system for mean glandular dose in mammography.
Matsumoto M; Inoue S; Honda I; Yamamoto S; Ueguchi T; Ogata Y; Johkoh T
Radiat Med; 2003; 21(6):280-4. PubMed ID: 14743903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A GATE Monte Carlo framework for dosimetric evaluation in mammography in an Algerian hospital.
Bouchikhi BA; Benhalouche S; Ati M; Khelassi Toutaoui N; Arbor N; Bendella SA; Dib ASA; Tebboune A; Belbachir AH; Taleb Ben Diab E
Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Jul; 197():110797. PubMed ID: 37043867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Average glandular dose coefficients for pendant-geometry breast CT using realistic breast phantoms.
Hernandez AM; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5096-5105. PubMed ID: 28715130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.
Sechopoulos I; Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4110-20. PubMed ID: 20879571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Marshall N; Meylaers T; Michielsen K; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimization of x-ray spectra in digital mammography through Monte Carlo simulations.
Cunha DM; Tomal A; Poletti ME
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1919-35. PubMed ID: 22421418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: patient radiation dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code.
Yakoumakis E; Tzamicha E; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):369-72. PubMed ID: 25836682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Monte Carlo simulation of average glandular dose and an investigation of influencing factors.
Nigapruke K; Puwanich P; Phaisangittisakul N; Youngdee W
J Radiat Res; 2010; 51(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 20523013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Air kerma calculation in Monte Carlo simulations for deriving normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; Russo P
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(14):N337-N349. PubMed ID: 28452342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and dedicated breast CT.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; Di Lillo F; Tucciariello RM; Bliznakova K; Russo P
Phys Med; 2018 Nov; 55():142-148. PubMed ID: 30314732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
