242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28295423)
1. Analysis of false-negative readings of automated breast ultrasound studies.
Grubstein A; Rapson Y; Gadiel I; Cohen M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jun; 45(5):245-251. PubMed ID: 28295423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions.
Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast cancers initially detected by hand-held ultrasound: detection performance of radiologists using automated breast ultrasound data.
Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 21498319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated breast ultrasound compared to hand-held ultrasound in surveillance after breast-conserving surgery.
Depretto C; Liguori A; Primolevo A; Di Cosimo S; Cartia F; Ferranti C; Scaperrotta GP
Tumori; 2021 Apr; 107(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 32552398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance Using Automated Breast Ultrasound System for Breast Cancer in Chinese Women Aged 40 Years or Older: A Comparative Study.
Zhang L; Bao LY; Tan YJ; Zhu LQ; Xu XJ; Zhu QQ; Shan YN; Zhao J; Xie LS; Liu J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Dec; 45(12):3137-3144. PubMed ID: 31563481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility and Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound System in Evaluating Pure Non-Mass Enhancement on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Kwon BR; Chang JM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Shin SU; Yi A; Cho N; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1210-1219. PubMed ID: 32729267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in women with dense breasts.
Jia M; Lin X; Zhou X; Yan H; Chen Y; Liu P; Bao L; Li A; Basu P; Qiao Y; Sankaranarayanan R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(3):589-597. PubMed ID: 32338323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 3D-Automated Breast Ultrasound With Handheld Breast Ultrasound Regarding Detection and BI-RADS Characterization of Lesions in Dense Breasts: A Study of 592 Cases.
Güldogan N; Yılmaz E; Arslan A; Küçükkaya F; Atila N; Arıbal E
Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 34955365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.
Vourtsis A; Kachulis A
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 28828640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whole-Breast Ultrasound for Breast Screening and Archiving.
Huang CS; Yang YW; Chen RT; Lo CM; Lo C; Cheng CF; Lee CS; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):926-933. PubMed ID: 28283326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound: Technical aspects and first results.
Vourtsis A
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Oct; 100(10):579-592. PubMed ID: 30962169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated Breast Ultrasound System for Breast Cancer Evaluation: Diagnostic Performance of the Two-View Scan Technique in Women with Small Breasts.
Kwon BR; Chang JM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Kim SY; Lee SM; Cho N; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Jan; 21(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 31920026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of Automated Breast Ultrasonography and Handheld Ultrasonography for Breast Lesion Size Measurement.
Park KW; Ko EY; Park S; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Kwon MR
Ultrasound Q; 2022 Jan; 38(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 35001027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integration of Handheld Ultrasound or Automated Breast Ultrasound among Women with Negative Mammographic Screening Findings: A Multi-center Population-based Study in China.
Ren W; Yan H; Zhao X; Jia M; Zhang S; Zhang J; Li Z; Ming L; Zhang Y; Li H; He L; Li X; Cheng X; Yue L; Zhou W; Qiao Y; Zhao F
Acad Radiol; 2023 Sep; 30 Suppl 2():S114-S126. PubMed ID: 37003874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound as a replacement for a hand-held second-look ultrasound for breast lesions detected initially on magnetic resonance imaging.
Chae EY; Shin HJ; Kim HJ; Yoo H; Baek S; Cha JH; Kim HH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2246-54. PubMed ID: 24035627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses in Asymptomatic Women: A Comparison Study With Handheld Ultrasound.
Niu L; Bao L; Zhu L; Tan Y; Xu X; Shan Y; Liu J; Zhu Q; Jiang C; Shen Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 38(11):2871-2880. PubMed ID: 30912178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of automated versus hand-held breast US in supplemental screening in asymptomatic women with dense breasts: is there a difference regarding woman preference, lesion detection and lesion characterization?
Tutar B; Esen Icten G; Guldogan N; Kara H; Arıkan AE; Tutar O; Uras C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 May; 301(5):1257-1265. PubMed ID: 32215718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
