These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28295423)
1. Analysis of false-negative readings of automated breast ultrasound studies. Grubstein A; Rapson Y; Gadiel I; Cohen M J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jun; 45(5):245-251. PubMed ID: 28295423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study. Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions. Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study. Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast cancers initially detected by hand-held ultrasound: detection performance of radiologists using automated breast ultrasound data. Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 21498319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated breast ultrasound compared to hand-held ultrasound in surveillance after breast-conserving surgery. Depretto C; Liguori A; Primolevo A; Di Cosimo S; Cartia F; Ferranti C; Scaperrotta GP Tumori; 2021 Apr; 107(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 32552398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance Using Automated Breast Ultrasound System for Breast Cancer in Chinese Women Aged 40 Years or Older: A Comparative Study. Zhang L; Bao LY; Tan YJ; Zhu LQ; Xu XJ; Zhu QQ; Shan YN; Zhao J; Xie LS; Liu J Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Dec; 45(12):3137-3144. PubMed ID: 31563481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility and Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound System in Evaluating Pure Non-Mass Enhancement on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Kwon BR; Chang JM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Shin SU; Yi A; Cho N; Moon WK Korean J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1210-1219. PubMed ID: 32729267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in women with dense breasts. Jia M; Lin X; Zhou X; Yan H; Chen Y; Liu P; Bao L; Li A; Basu P; Qiao Y; Sankaranarayanan R Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(3):589-597. PubMed ID: 32338323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 3D-Automated Breast Ultrasound With Handheld Breast Ultrasound Regarding Detection and BI-RADS Characterization of Lesions in Dense Breasts: A Study of 592 Cases. Güldogan N; Yılmaz E; Arslan A; Küçükkaya F; Atila N; Arıbal E Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 34955365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women. Vourtsis A; Kachulis A Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 28828640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whole-Breast Ultrasound for Breast Screening and Archiving. Huang CS; Yang YW; Chen RT; Lo CM; Lo C; Cheng CF; Lee CS; Chang RF Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):926-933. PubMed ID: 28283326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound: Technical aspects and first results. Vourtsis A Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Oct; 100(10):579-592. PubMed ID: 30962169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated Breast Ultrasound System for Breast Cancer Evaluation: Diagnostic Performance of the Two-View Scan Technique in Women with Small Breasts. Kwon BR; Chang JM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Kim SY; Lee SM; Cho N; Moon WK Korean J Radiol; 2020 Jan; 21(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 31920026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of Automated Breast Ultrasonography and Handheld Ultrasonography for Breast Lesion Size Measurement. Park KW; Ko EY; Park S; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Kwon MR Ultrasound Q; 2022 Jan; 38(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 35001027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integration of Handheld Ultrasound or Automated Breast Ultrasound among Women with Negative Mammographic Screening Findings: A Multi-center Population-based Study in China. Ren W; Yan H; Zhao X; Jia M; Zhang S; Zhang J; Li Z; Ming L; Zhang Y; Li H; He L; Li X; Cheng X; Yue L; Zhou W; Qiao Y; Zhao F Acad Radiol; 2023 Sep; 30 Suppl 2():S114-S126. PubMed ID: 37003874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound as a replacement for a hand-held second-look ultrasound for breast lesions detected initially on magnetic resonance imaging. Chae EY; Shin HJ; Kim HJ; Yoo H; Baek S; Cha JH; Kim HH Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2246-54. PubMed ID: 24035627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses in Asymptomatic Women: A Comparison Study With Handheld Ultrasound. Niu L; Bao L; Zhu L; Tan Y; Xu X; Shan Y; Liu J; Zhu Q; Jiang C; Shen Y J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 38(11):2871-2880. PubMed ID: 30912178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast Cancer Screening With Automated Breast US and Mammography vs Handheld US and Mammography in Women With Dense Breasts in a Real-World Clinical Setting. Winkelman AJ; Tulenko K; Epstein SH; Nguyen JV; Ford C; Miller MM J Breast Imaging; 2024 Sep; 6(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 39036960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]