178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28295434)
1. The potential of dual-energy CT to reduce proton beam range uncertainties.
Bär E; Lalonde A; Royle G; Lu HM; Bouchard H
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2332-2344. PubMed ID: 28295434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards subpercentage uncertainty proton stopping-power mapping via dual-energy CT: Direct experimental validation and uncertainty analysis of a statistical iterative image reconstruction method.
Medrano M; Liu R; Zhao T; Webb T; Politte DG; Whiting BR; Liao R; Ge T; Porras-Chaverri MA; O'Sullivan JA; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1599-1618. PubMed ID: 35029302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental validation of two dual-energy CT methods for proton therapy using heterogeneous tissue samples.
Bär E; Lalonde A; Zhang R; Jee KW; Yang K; Sharp G; Liu B; Royle G; Bouchard H; Lu HM
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 29134674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
Zhu J; Penfold SN
Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images.
Hudobivnik N; Schwarz F; Johnson T; Agolli L; Dedes G; Tessonnier T; Verhaegen F; Thieke C; Belka C; Sommer WH; Parodi K; Landry G
Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):495. PubMed ID: 26745942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A robust empirical parametrization of proton stopping power using dual energy CT.
Taasti VT; Petersen JB; Muren LP; Thygesen J; Hansen DC
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5547. PubMed ID: 27782721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tissue decomposition from dual energy CT data for MC based dose calculation in particle therapy.
Hünemohr N; Paganetti H; Greilich S; Jäkel O; Seco J
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061714. PubMed ID: 24877809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of proton stopping power ratios using dual-energy CT basis material decomposition.
Pettersson E; Thilander-Klang A; Bäck A
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):881-897. PubMed ID: 38194501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of beam-hardening corrections on proton relative stopping power estimates from single- and dual-energy CT.
Chacko MS; Wu D; Grewal HS; Sonnad JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 23(9):e13711. PubMed ID: 35816460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of relative proton stopping power measurements across patient size using dual- and single-energy CT.
Michalak G; Taasti V; Krauss B; Deisher A; Halaweish A; McCollough C
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1465-1471. PubMed ID: 28885130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ex vivo validation of a stoichiometric dual energy CT proton stopping power ratio calibration.
Xie Y; Ainsley C; Yin L; Zou W; McDonough J; Solberg TD; Lin A; Teo BK
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(5):055016. PubMed ID: 29513647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Theoretical and experimental analysis of photon counting detector CT for proton stopping power prediction.
Taasti VT; Hansen DC; Michalak GJ; Deisher AJ; Kruse JJ; Muren LP; Petersen JBB; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):5186-5196. PubMed ID: 30191573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stopping-power ratio estimation for proton radiotherapy using dual-energy computed tomography and prior-image constrained denoising.
Zimmerman J; Thor D; Poludniowski G
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1481-1495. PubMed ID: 36322128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Bayesian approach to solve proton stopping powers from noisy multi-energy CT data.
Lalonde A; Bär E; Bouchard H
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5293-5302. PubMed ID: 28752662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Implementation of Dual-energy CT for Proton Treatment Planning on Pseudo-monoenergetic CT scans.
Wohlfahrt P; Möhler C; Hietschold V; Menkel S; Greilich S; Krause M; Baumann M; Enghardt W; Richter C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Feb; 97(2):427-434. PubMed ID: 28068248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Systematic analysis of the impact of imaging noise on dual-energy CT-based proton stopping power ratio estimation.
Lee HHC; Li B; Duan X; Zhou L; Jia X; Yang M
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2251-2263. PubMed ID: 30883827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of proton stopping power estimation of silicone breast implants with single and dual-energy CT calibration techniques.
Chacko MS; Grewal HS; Wu D; Sonnad JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 22(9):159-170. PubMed ID: 34275175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual-energy CT-based stopping power prediction for dental materials in particle therapy.
Longarino FK; Herpel C; Tessonnier T; Mein S; Ackermann B; Debus J; Schwindling FS; Stiller W; Mairani A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 24(8):e13977. PubMed ID: 37032540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of dual- and multi-energy CT on proton pencil beam range uncertainties: a Monte Carlo study.
Lalonde A; Simard M; Remy C; Bär E; Bouchard H
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(19):195012. PubMed ID: 30183681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does kV-MV dual-energy computed tomography have an advantage in determining proton stopping power ratios in patients?
Yang M; Virshup G; Clayton J; Zhu XR; Mohan R; Dong L
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4499-515. PubMed ID: 21719949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
