These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28295495)

  • 1. Variation in passing standards for graduation-level knowledge items at UK medical schools.
    Taylor CA; Gurnell M; Melville CR; Kluth DC; Johnson N; Wass V
    Med Educ; 2017 Jun; 51(6):612-620. PubMed ID: 28295495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variation in performance on common content items at UK medical schools.
    Hope D; Kluth D; Homer M; Dewar A; Fuller R; Cameron H
    BMC Med Educ; 2021 Jun; 21(1):323. PubMed ID: 34090426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using borderline methods to compare passing standards for OSCEs at graduation across three medical schools.
    Boursicot KA; Roberts TE; Pell G
    Med Educ; 2007 Nov; 41(11):1024-31. PubMed ID: 17973762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standard setting for clinical competence at graduation from medical school: a comparison of passing scores across five medical schools.
    Boursicot KA; Roberts TE; Pell G
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2006 May; 11(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 16729244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing single-best-answer and very-short-answer questions for the assessment of applied medical knowledge in 20 UK medical schools: Cross-sectional study.
    Sam AH; Westacott R; Gurnell M; Wilson R; Meeran K; Brown C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e032550. PubMed ID: 31558462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sources of variation in performance on a shared OSCE station across four UK medical schools.
    Chesser A; Cameron H; Evans P; Cleland J; Boursicot K; Mires G
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 19493176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variations in medical school graduating examinations in the United Kingdom: are clinical competence standards comparable?
    McCrorie P; Boursicot KA
    Med Teach; 2009 Mar; 31(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 19288309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Setting school-level outcome standards.
    Stern DT; Friedman Ben-David M; Norcini J; Wojtczak A; Schwarz MR
    Med Educ; 2006 Feb; 40(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 16451245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring differences in individual and group judgements in standard setting.
    Yeates P; Cope N; Luksaite E; Hassell A; Dikomitis L
    Med Educ; 2019 Sep; 53(9):941-952. PubMed ID: 31264741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Achieving equal standards in medical student education: is a national exit examination the answer?
    Koczwara B; Tattersall MH; Barton MB; Coventry BJ; Dewar JM; Millar JL; Olver IN; Schwarz MA; Starmer DL; Turner DR; Stockler MR
    Med J Aust; 2005 Mar; 182(5):228-30. PubMed ID: 15748133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in expectations of passing standards in communication skills for pre-clinical and clinical medical students.
    Park YS; Kamin C; Son D; Kim G; Yudkowsky R
    Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Feb; 102(2):301-308. PubMed ID: 30245099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Order effects in high stakes undergraduate examinations: an analysis of 5 years of administrative data in one UK medical school.
    Burt J; Abel G; Barclay M; Evans R; Benson J; Gurnell M
    BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012541. PubMed ID: 27729351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimum accepted competency examination: test item analysis.
    McCrossan P; Nicholson A; McCallion N
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 May; 22(1):400. PubMed ID: 35614439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two methods of standard setting: the performance of the three-level Angoff method.
    Jalili M; Hejri SM; Norcini JJ
    Med Educ; 2011 Dec; 45(12):1199-208. PubMed ID: 22122428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standard setting: comparison of two methods.
    George S; Haque MS; Oyebode F
    BMC Med Educ; 2006 Sep; 6():46. PubMed ID: 16972990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prescribing Safety Assessment 2016: Delivery of a national prescribing assessment to 7343 UK final-year medical students.
    Maxwell SRJ; Coleman JJ; Bollington L; Taylor C; Webb DJ
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2017 Oct; 83(10):2249-2258. PubMed ID: 28449302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical Students' Progress in Detecting and Interpreting Visual and Auditory Clinical Findings.
    Han H; Williams R; Hingle S; Klamen DL; Rull GM; Clark T; Daniels J
    Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(4):380-388. PubMed ID: 32281403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Panel expertise for an Angoff standard setting procedure in progress testing: item writers compared to recently graduated students.
    Verhoeven BH; Verwijnen GM; Muijtjens AM; Scherpbier AJ; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2002 Sep; 36(9):860-7. PubMed ID: 12354249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do we need a core curriculum for medical students? A scoping review.
    Sharma M; Murphy R; Doody GA
    BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e027369. PubMed ID: 31473611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of Multiple-Choice Items in Summative Examinations: Questionnaire Survey Among German Undergraduate Dental Training Programs.
    Rössler L; Herrmann M; Wiegand A; Kanzow P
    JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Jun; 10():e58126. PubMed ID: 38952022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.