These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28295578)

  • 1. Measurement of acetabular version based on biplanar radiographs with 3D reconstructions in comparison to CT as reference standard in cadavers.
    Agten CA; Jonczy M; Ullrich O; Pfirrmann CWA; Sutter R; Buck FM
    Clin Anat; 2017 Jul; 30(5):591-598. PubMed ID: 28295578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acetabular coverage differs between standing and supine positions: model-based assessment of low-dose biplanar radiographs and comparison with CT.
    Fritz B; Agten CA; Boldt FK; Zingg PO; Pfirrmann CWA; Sutter R
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5691-5699. PubMed ID: 30903332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional acetabular orientation varies between supine and standing radiographs: implications for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.
    Ross JR; Tannenbaum EP; Nepple JJ; Kelly BT; Larson CM; Bedi A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1267-73. PubMed ID: 25560956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normative 3D acetabular orientation measurements by the low-dose EOS imaging system in 102 asymptomatic subjects in standing position: Analyses by side, gender, pelvic incidence and reproducibility.
    Thelen T; Thelen P; Demezon H; Aunoble S; Le Huec JC
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Apr; 103(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 28025151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of CT image-based software for three-dimensional measurement of acetabular coverage profile.
    Wenzl MP; Heller M; Janz V; Perka C; Wassilew GI
    Technol Health Care; 2017 Oct; 25(5):989-1004. PubMed ID: 28759983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Standardized AP radiographs do not provide reliable diagnostic measures for the assessment of acetabular retroversion.
    Wassilew GI; Heller MO; Diederichs G; Janz V; Wenzl M; Perka C
    J Orthop Res; 2012 Sep; 30(9):1369-76. PubMed ID: 22411574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The crossover sign overestimates acetabular retroversion.
    Zaltz I; Kelly BT; Hetsroni I; Bedi A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Aug; 471(8):2463-70. PubMed ID: 23136058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of acetabular version in the native hip: comparison between 2D axial CT and 3D CT measurements.
    Dandachli W; Ul Islam S; Tippett R; Hall-Craggs MA; Witt JD
    Skeletal Radiol; 2011 Jul; 40(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 21181403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Supine and Standing AP Pelvis Radiographs in the Evaluation of Pincer Femoroacetabular Impingement.
    Jackson TJ; Estess AA; Adamson GJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jul; 474(7):1692-6. PubMed ID: 26913511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of acetabular version angle measurements between prone and reformatted supine computed tomography images.
    Chong le R; Too CW
    Skeletal Radiol; 2014 Mar; 43(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 24337490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The anterior center edge angle in Lequesne's false profile view: interrater correlation, dependence on pelvic tilt and correlation to anterior acetabular coverage in the sagital plane. A cadaver study.
    Zingg PO; Werner CM; Sukthankar A; Zanetti M; Seifert B; Dora C
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Jun; 129(6):787-91. PubMed ID: 18629522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A quantitative method to assess focal acetabular overcoverage resulting from pincer deformity using CT data.
    Murphy RJ; Subhawong TK; Chhabra A; Carrino JA; Armand M; Hungerford M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Oct; 469(10):2846-54. PubMed ID: 21748515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Radiographs and Computed Tomography for the Screening of Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine Impingement.
    Schindler BR; Venderley MB; Mikula JD; Chahla J; Dornan GJ; Turnbull TL; LaPrade RF; Philippon MJ
    Arthroscopy; 2017 Apr; 33(4):766-772. PubMed ID: 28063761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does hemipelvis structure and position influence acetabulum orientation?
    Musielak B; Jóźwiak M; Rychlik M; Chen BP; Idzior M; Grzegorzewski A
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Mar; 17():131. PubMed ID: 26984181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interchangeability of CT and 3D "pseudo-CT" MRI for preoperative planning in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.
    Guirguis A; Polster J; Karim W; Obuchowski N; Rosneck J; Goodwin R; Subhas N
    Skeletal Radiol; 2020 Jul; 49(7):1073-1080. PubMed ID: 31996983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) lower limb measurements in adults: Comparison of micro-dose and low-dose biplanar radiographs.
    Rosskopf AB; Pfirrmann CW; Buck FM
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3054-62. PubMed ID: 26738507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of pelvic tilt on radiographic markers of acetabular coverage.
    Henebry A; Gaskill T
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 41(11):2599-603. PubMed ID: 23982398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Femoral and tibial torsion measurements in children and adolescents: comparison of MRI and 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiographs.
    Rosskopf AB; Buck FM; Pfirrmann CW; Ramseier LE
    Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Apr; 46(4):469-476. PubMed ID: 28154901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of a CT image based software for three-dimensional measurement of acetabular cup orientation.
    Wassilew GI; Janz V; Heller M; Wenzl M; Perka C; Hasart O
    Technol Health Care; 2011; 19(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 21957510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification with multidetector CT: are standard Judet radiographs necessary?
    Ohashi K; El-Khoury GY; Abu-Zahra KW; Berbaum KS
    Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 17005769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.