These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28298592)

  • 1. Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Johnson MM
    Radiol Technol; 2017 Jan; 88(3):299M-319M. PubMed ID: 28298592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
    Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening for dense breasts: digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Destounis SV; Morgan R; Arieno A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 25615747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Digital breast tomosynthesis].
    Preibsch H; Siegmann-Luz KC
    Radiologe; 2015 Jan; 55(1):59-67; quiz 68-70. PubMed ID: 25609581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Synthesized Digital Mammography Imaging.
    Freer PE; Winkler N
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 28411676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
    Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imaging With Synthesized 2D Mammography: Differences, Advantages, and Pitfalls Compared With Digital Mammography.
    Zuckerman SP; Maidment ADA; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):222-229. PubMed ID: 28463546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast Tomosynthesis: Practical Considerations.
    Friedewald SM
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 May; 55(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 28411675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.
    Vedantham S; Karellas A; Vijayaraghavan GR; Kopans DB
    Radiology; 2015 Dec; 277(3):663-84. PubMed ID: 26599926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.
    Haas BM; Kalra V; Geisel J; Raghu M; Durand M; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23901124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast density and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Reynolds A
    Radiol Technol; 2013; 85(1):63M-82M; quiz 83M-85M. PubMed ID: 24029897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Skaane P
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 27138386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
    Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital breast tomosynthesis: Image acquisition principles and artifacts.
    Sujlana PS; Mahesh M; Vedantham S; Harvey SC; Mullen LA; Woods RW
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():188-195. PubMed ID: 30236642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Full-Field Digital Mammography in Recall Rates and Cancer Detection Rates.
    Procasco M
    Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(3):349-51. PubMed ID: 26721849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategies to Increase Cancer Detection: Review of True-Positive and False-Negative Results at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening.
    Korhonen KE; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(7):1954-1965. PubMed ID: 27715711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital breast tomosynthesis in one or two views as a replacement or adjunct technique to full-field digital mammography.
    Svahn TM; Houssami N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):314-20. PubMed ID: 25848107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.