236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28299446)
21. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Initial experience in clinical application of thulium laser contact lithotripsy for transurethral treatment of urolithiasis].
Martov AG; Ergakov DV; Guseinov MA; Andronov AS; Dutov SV; Vinnichenko VA; Kovalenko AA
Urologiia; 2018 Mar; (1):112-120. PubMed ID: 29634144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A new optical coupling control technique and application in SWL.
Lv JL
Urolithiasis; 2016 Nov; 44(6):539-544. PubMed ID: 27025864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does Previous Open Renal Stone Surgery Affect the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Treatment in Adults with Renal Stones?
Gültekin MH; Türegün FA; Ozkan B; Tülü B; Güleç GG; Tansu N; Demirdağ Ç; Kendigelen P; Erözenci A; Önal B
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1295-1300. PubMed ID: 28891311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Shockwave lithotripsy for kidney stones as a first-line therapy in children younger than 2 years.
Asi T; Dogan HS; Altan M; Bozaci AC; Ceylan T; Asci A; Tekgul S
J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Apr; 16(2):193.e1-193.e6. PubMed ID: 32037146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring.
Desai M; Sun Y; Buchholz N; Fuller A; Matsuda T; Matlaga B; Miller N; Bolton D; Alomar M; Ganpule A
World J Urol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 28303335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Hospital admission for treatment of complications after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones: a study of risk factors.
El-Nahas AR; Taha DE; Elsaadany MM; Zahran MH; Hassan M; Sheir KZ
Urolithiasis; 2018 Jun; 46(3):291-296. PubMed ID: 28555349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pediatric ureteroscopic stone management.
Thomas JC; DeMarco RT; Donohoe JM; Adams MC; Brock JW; Pope JC
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):1072-4. PubMed ID: 16094060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Outcomes of long-term follow-up of asymptomatic renal stones and prediction of stone-related events.
Li X; Zhu W; Lam W; Yue Y; Duan H; Zeng G
BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):485-492. PubMed ID: 30253029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones.
Breda A; Ogunyemi O; Leppert JT; Schulam PG
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1190-6. PubMed ID: 18571315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) for large (≥1 cm) paediatric stones: Outcomes from a university teaching hospital.
Featherstone NC; Somani BK; Griffin SJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Apr; 13(2):202.e1-202.e7. PubMed ID: 28336220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) still suitable for >1.5 cm intrarenal stones? Data analysis of 1902 SWLs.
Azal Neto W; Morales E; Joseane Pachecco M; Pedro RN; Reis LO
Scand J Urol; 2021 Oct; 55(5):388-393. PubMed ID: 34279162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.
Pareek G; Hedican SP; Lee FT; Nakada SY
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):941-4. PubMed ID: 16286099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones.
Onal B; Demirkesen O; Tansu N; Kalkan M; Altintaş R; Yalçin V
J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 15311043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): outcomes from a national SWL database in New Zealand.
Alexander CE; Gowland S; Cadwallader J; Reynard JM; Turney BW
BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117 Suppl 4():76-81. PubMed ID: 26923107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ureteroscopic management of renal calculi in anomalous kidneys.
Weizer AZ; Springhart WP; Ekeruo WO; Matlaga BR; Tan YH; Assimos DG; Preminger GM
Urology; 2005 Feb; 65(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 15708035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Is there a role for prophylactic shock wave lithotripsy for asymptomatic calyceal stones?
Collins JW; Keeley FX
Curr Opin Urol; 2002 Jul; 12(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 12072647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. No Wound for Stones <2 cm in Horseshoe Kidney: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.
Chen H; Chen G; Pan Y; Zhu Y; Xiong C; Chen H; Yang Z
Urol Int; 2019; 103(3):249-255. PubMed ID: 31096234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Is the gravity effect of radiographic anatomic features enough to justify stone clearance or fragments retention following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL).
Mustafa M
Urol Res; 2012 Aug; 40(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 21847556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The natural history of asymptomatic calyceal stones.
Darrad MP; Yallappa S; Metcalfe J; Subramonian K
BJU Int; 2018 Aug; 122(2):263-269. PubMed ID: 29675983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
