236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28299446)
41. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi.
Grasso M; Conlin M; Bagley D
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 9679874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Salvage extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy after failed distal ureteroscopy.
Aynehchi S; Samadi AA; Gallo SJ; Konno S; Tazaki H; Eshghi M
J Endourol; 2002 Aug; 16(6):355-8. PubMed ID: 12227908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Ureteroscopic and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for rather large renal pelvis calculi.
Tavakkoli Tabasi K; Baghban Haghighi M
Urol J; 2007; 4(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 18270946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Lessons Learnt (Clinical Outcomes and Cost Savings) from Virtual Stone Clinic and Their Application in the Era Post-COVID-19: Prospective Outcomes over a 6-Year Period from a University Teaching Hospital.
Hughes T; Pietropaolo A; Archer M; Davis T; Tear L; Somani BK
J Endourol; 2021 Feb; 35(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 32731751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The effect of renal cortical thickness on the treatment outcomes of kidney stones treated with shockwave lithotripsy.
Ng CF; Luke S; Chiu PK; Teoh JY; Wong KT; Hou SS
Korean J Urol; 2015 May; 56(5):379-85. PubMed ID: 25964839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. 5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.
Osman MM; Alfano Y; Kamp S; Haecker A; Alken P; Michel MS; Knoll T
Eur Urol; 2005 Jun; 47(6):860-4. PubMed ID: 15925084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones is not associated with hypertension and diabetes mellitus.
Sato Y; Tanda H; Kato S; Ohnishi S; Nakajima H; Nanbu A; Nitta T; Koroku M; Akagashi K; Hanzawa T
Urology; 2008 Apr; 71(4):586-91; discussion 591-2. PubMed ID: 18387387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Pediatric urolithiasis: 15 years of local experience with minimally invasive endourological management of pediatric calculi.
Raza A; Turna B; Smith G; Moussa S; Tolley DA
J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):682-5. PubMed ID: 16006948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Predictive factors and management of steinstrasse after shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis--a multivariate analysis study.
Onal B; Citgez S; Tansu N; Demirdag C; Dogan C; Gonul B; Demirkesen O; Obek C; Erozenci A
Urology; 2012 Nov; 80(5):1127-31. PubMed ID: 22999455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Impact of lower pole anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy.
Juan YS; Chuang SM; Wu WJ; Shen JT; Wang CJ; Huang CH
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2005 Aug; 21(8):358-64. PubMed ID: 16158878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluation of pancreatic damage after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous stone surgery, and ureteroscopy.
Thiel DD; Brisson TE; Heckman MG; Arnold M; Haley W; Khambhati J; Wehle MJ; Igel TC; Parker AS
Urology; 2011 Jun; 77(6):1288-91. PubMed ID: 21215433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Efficacy of commercialised extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy service: a review of 589 renal stones.
Nielsen TK; Jensen JB
BMC Urol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):59. PubMed ID: 28750620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Two-year experience with ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy v ureteroscopic manipulation.
Park H; Park M; Park T
J Endourol; 1998 Dec; 12(6):501-4. PubMed ID: 9895251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Complications and outcomes following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective study of 3,241 patients.
Salem S; Mehrsai A; Zartab H; Shahdadi N; Pourmand G
Urol Res; 2010 Apr; 38(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 20016885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A low or high BMI is a risk factor for renal hematoma after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for kidney stones.
Nussberger F; Roth B; Metzger T; Kiss B; Thalmann GN; Seiler R
Urolithiasis; 2017 Jun; 45(3):317-321. PubMed ID: 27576325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Shock wave lithotripsy in patients with renal calculi.
Tayib AM; Mosli HA; Farsi HM; Atwa MA; Saada HA
Saudi Med J; 2008 Aug; 29(8):1180-3. PubMed ID: 18690315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Transureteral lithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in management of upper ureteral calculi: a comparative study.
Nikoobakht MR; Emamzadeh A; Abedi AR; Moradi K; Mehrsai A
Urol J; 2007; 4(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 18270943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Piezoelectric shockwave lithotripsy of urinary calculi: comparative study of stone depth in kidney and ureter treatments.
Robert M; A'Ch S; Lanfrey P; Guiter J; Navratil H
J Endourol; 1999 Dec; 13(10):699-703. PubMed ID: 10646673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. SWL: our twenty-four year experience.
Zanetti G; Trinchieri A; Montanari E; Rocco F
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2008 Mar; 80(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18533621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Is flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy the new gold standard for lower pole renal stones when compared to shock wave lithotripsy: Comparative outcomes from a University hospital over similar time period.
Burr J; Ishii H; Simmonds N; Somani BK
Cent European J Urol; 2015; 68(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 26251738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
