These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28300383)

  • 1. Dosimetry analysis of panoramic-imaging devices in different-sized phantoms.
    Wahid MA; Choi E; MacDonald DS; Ford NL
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 28300383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring absorbed dose for i-CAT CBCT examinations in child, adolescent and adult phantoms.
    Choi E; Ford NL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(6):20150018. PubMed ID: 25785822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does dose optimisation in digital panoramic radiography affect diagnostic performance?
    Martins LAC; Brasil DM; Forner LA; Viccari C; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ; Oliveira ML
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Feb; 25(2):637-643. PubMed ID: 32845471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography.
    Al-Okshi A; Nilsson M; Petersson A; Wiese M; Lindh C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120343. PubMed ID: 23610090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from panoramic radiography.
    Rottke D; Grossekettler L; Sawada K; Poxleitner P; Schulze D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130302. PubMed ID: 24174012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL; Howerton WB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 16798915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics.
    Signorelli L; Patcas R; Peltomäki T; Schätzle M
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 26747662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paediatric absorbed doses from rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kuroyanagi K; Nishizawa K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 11571549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Absorbed doses for patients undergoing panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography and CBCT.
    Wrzesień M; Olszewski J
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Jul; 30(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 28584324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
    Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exposure and dose in panoramic radiology.
    Goldstein A
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):1033-40. PubMed ID: 9650194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose distributions in adult and child head phantoms for panoramic and cone beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint.
    Iskanderani D; Nilsson M; Alstergren P; Hellén-Halme K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Aug; 130(2):200-208. PubMed ID: 32094027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation dosimetry analyses of radiographic imaging systems used for orthodontic treatment: comparison among child, adolescent, and adult patients.
    Lee KS; Nam OH; Kim GT; Choi SC; Choi YS; Hwang EH
    Oral Radiol; 2021 Apr; 37(2):245-250. PubMed ID: 32361820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
    Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
    Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
    Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated measurement for image distortion analysis in 2D panoramic imaging of dental CBCT system: A phantom study.
    Rabba JA; Suhaimi FM; Mat Jafri MZ; Jaafar HA; Osman ND
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 May; 29(3):533-538. PubMed ID: 36913788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography.
    Dula K; Sanderink G; van der Stelt PF; Mini R; Buser D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Aug; 86(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 9720100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absorbed dose reduced by sliced exposure using sector selector system with rotational panoramic radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Kobayashi N; Kousuge Y; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1994 Aug; 35(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 8620590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.