656 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28300385)
1. A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.
Lin L; Huang S; Kang M; Hiltunen P; Vanderstraeten R; Lindberg J; Siljamaki S; Wareing T; Davis I; Barnett A; McGhee J; Simone CB; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Ainsley C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):44-49. PubMed ID: 28300385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A standardized commissioning framework of Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithms for proton pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems.
Chang CW; Huang S; Harms J; Zhou J; Zhang R; Dhabaan A; Slopsema R; Kang M; Liu T; McDonald M; Langen K; Lin L
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1545-1557. PubMed ID: 31945191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
Shirey RJ; Wu HT
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An analytical dose-averaged LET calculation algorithm considering the off-axis LET enhancement by secondary protons for spot-scanning proton therapy.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Ueda H; Fujii Y; Fujii T; Takao S; Miyamoto N; Shimizu S; Fujimoto R; Umegaki K; Shirato H
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3404-3416. PubMed ID: 29788552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental validation of the TOPAS Monte Carlo system for passive scattering proton therapy.
Testa M; Schümann J; Lu HM; Shin J; Faddegon B; Perl J; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121719. PubMed ID: 24320505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Huang S; Kang M; Souris K; Ainsley C; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):558-572. PubMed ID: 30058170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Independent dose verification system with Monte Carlo simulations using TOPAS for passive scattering proton therapy at the National Cancer Center in Korea.
Shin WG; Testa M; Kim HS; Jeong JH; Lee SB; Kim YJ; Min CH
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7598-7616. PubMed ID: 28809759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A pencil beam algorithm for magnetic resonance image-guided proton therapy.
Padilla-Cabal F; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29532490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimentally validated pencil beam scanning source model in TOPAS.
Lin L; Kang M; Solberg TD; Ainsley CG; McDonough JE
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(22):6859-73. PubMed ID: 25349982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An MCNPX Monte Carlo model of a discrete spot scanning proton beam therapy nozzle.
Sawakuchi GO; Mirkovic D; Perles LA; Sahoo N; Zhu XR; Ciangaru G; Suzuki K; Gillin MT; Mohan R; Titt U
Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4960-70. PubMed ID: 20964215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nuclear halo measurements for accurate prediction of field size factor in a Varian ProBeam proton PBS system.
Harms J; Chang CW; Zhang R; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 31793202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An algorithm to assess the need for clinical Monte Carlo dose calculation for small proton therapy fields based on quantification of tissue heterogeneity.
Bueno M; Paganetti H; Duch MA; Schuemann J
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081704. PubMed ID: 23927301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Validation of a Ray-Casting Analytical Dose Engine for Spot Scanning Proton Delivery Systems.
Younkin JE; Morales DH; Shen J; Shan J; Bues M; Lentz JM; Schild SE; Stoker JB; Ding X; Liu W
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019; 18():1533033819887182. PubMed ID: 31755362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.
Langner UW; Mundis M; Strauss D; Zhu M; Mossahebi S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):156-163. PubMed ID: 29205763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
