These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28300388)

  • 1. The assessment and characterization of the built-in internal photometer of primary diagnostic monitors.
    Ruuge AE; Mahmood UA; Erdi YE
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 28300388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of primary diagnostic monitors (PDMs) over time.
    Ruuge AE; Gao Y; Erdi YE
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):180-185. PubMed ID: 31833641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.
    Samei E; Badano A; Chakraborty D; Compton K; Cornelius C; Corrigan K; Flynn MJ; Hemminger B; Hangiandreou N; Johnson J; Moxley-Stevens DM; Pavlicek W; Roehrig H; Rutz L; Shepard J; Uzenoff RA; Wang J; Willis CE;
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1205-25. PubMed ID: 15895604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of flat panel LCD primary class display performance based on AAPM TG 18 acceptance protocol.
    Jung H; Kim HJ; Kang WS; Yoo SK; Fujioka K; Hasegawa M; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2155-64. PubMed ID: 15305470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constancy of built-in luminance meter measurements in diagnostic displays.
    Silosky M; Marsh RM
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121902. PubMed ID: 24320513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imaging acquisition display performance: an evaluation and discussion of performance metrics and procedures.
    Silosky MS; Marsh RM; Scherzinger AL
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):334-341. PubMed ID: 27455501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of time in use on the display performance of the iPad.
    Caffery LJ; Manthey KL; Sim LH
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20150657. PubMed ID: 27181625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SoftCopy Display Quality Assurance Program at Texas Children's Hospital.
    Ly CK
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():33-40. PubMed ID: 12105695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and evaluation of a method of calibrating medical displays based on fixed adaptation.
    Sund P; Månsson LG; Båth M
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2018-28. PubMed ID: 25832092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variations in performance of LCDs are still evident after DICOM gray-scale standard display calibration.
    Lowe JM; Brennan PC; Evanoff MG; McEntee MF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 20566814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization of Luminance and Color Properties of 6-MP Wide-Screen Displays.
    Silosky M; Marsh RM
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 26162527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of 'commercial-off-the-shelf' (COTS) monitors displaying dental radiographs.
    McIlgorm DJ; Lawinski C; Ng S; McNulty JP
    Br Dent J; 2013 Dec; 215(11):E22. PubMed ID: 24309815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grayscale calibration and quality assurance of diagnostic monitors in a PACS system.
    Crespi A; Bonsignore F; Paruccini N; Macchi I
    Radiol Med; 2006 Sep; 111(6):863-75. PubMed ID: 16896553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical Performance Assessment and Quality Control of Ultrasound Device Monitors.
    Vuorenmaa A; Siitama E; Hakulinen U; Eskola H
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Jan; 49(1):380-387. PubMed ID: 36280444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Color standard display function: A proposed extension of DICOM GSDF.
    Kimpe T; Rostang J; Van Hoey G; Xthona A
    Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5009. PubMed ID: 27587031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calibration of the Nuclear Associates 07-621 precision photometer.
    Goode DH; Pointon RC
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Jun; 28(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 16060317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality control of cathode-ray tube monitors for medical imaging using a simple photometer.
    Parsons DM; Kim Y; Haynor DR
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 7734525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance evaluation of soft copy display systems according to AAPM TG18 protocol.
    Olgar T; Kamberli E
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2013 Jun; 36(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 23729181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Photometric Compliance of Tablet Screens and Retro-Illuminated Acuity Charts As Visual Acuity Measurement Devices.
    Livingstone IA; Tarbert CM; Giardini ME; Bastawrous A; Middleton D; Hamilton R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150676. PubMed ID: 27002333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychophysical evaluation of calibration curve for diagnostic LCD monitor.
    Uemura M; Asai Y; Yamaguchi M; Fujita H; Shintani Y; Sanada S
    Radiat Med; 2006 Dec; 24(10):653-8. PubMed ID: 17186319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.