282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28300465)
41. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multi-institutional cohort study.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Ditto A; Vizza E; Malzoni M; Raspagliesi F; Uccella S; Corrado G; Cosentino F; Gotsch F; Martinelli F; Franchi M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):2007-15. PubMed ID: 23224830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in women with early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tantitamit T; Huang KG; Lee CL
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jul; 59(4):481-488. PubMed ID: 32653117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer.
Wang YZ; Deng L; Xu HC; Zhang Y; Liang ZQ
BMC Cancer; 2015 Nov; 15():928. PubMed ID: 26596955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Patterns of recurrence and survival after abdominal versus laparoscopic/robotic radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer.
Kong TW; Chang SJ; Piao X; Paek J; Lee Y; Lee EJ; Chun M; Ryu HS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Jan; 42(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 26554751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies.
Zhang SS; Ding T; Cui ZH; Lv Y; Jiang RA
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(4):e14171. PubMed ID: 30681582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparing thermal welding instrument-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus conventional radical hysterectomy in the management of FIGO IB1 squamous cell cervical carcinoma.
Chen CH; Wang PH; Chiu LH; Chang WH
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(5):442-5. PubMed ID: 24475579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea.
Kim SI; Lee M; Lee S; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim YB
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Oct; 155(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 31383569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The Role of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix.
Park JY; Kim D; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):825-833. PubMed ID: 27503491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study.
Nam JH; Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT
Ann Oncol; 2012 Apr; 23(4):903-11. PubMed ID: 21841155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of long-term bowel symptoms after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer.
He R; Xue Y; Zhuang X; Wang H; Lu Y
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Feb; 34(2):439-444. PubMed ID: 36094624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effect of modified no-touch laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on outcomes of early stage cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
He F; Yuan S; Chen X; Zhang S; Han Y; Lin T; Xu B; Huang S; Pan Z
Cancer Med; 2022 Jun; 11(11):2224-2232. PubMed ID: 35156771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Bogani G; Gasparri ML; Di Donato V; Zanaboni F; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25468458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The impact of the surgical routes and learning curve of radical hysterectomy on the survival outcomes in stage IB cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
Liu Y; Li L; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Lang J
Int J Surg; 2019 Aug; 68():72-77. PubMed ID: 31220631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Laparotomy conversion rate of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in a consecutive series without case selection.
Park JY; Nam JH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):3030-5. PubMed ID: 24748163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.
Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Fusco A; Malzoni C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1316-23. PubMed ID: 19224286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: long-term follow-up.
Park NY; Chong GO; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):355-62. PubMed ID: 21270616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Efficacy evaluation of vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a single-center retrospective case series study.
Wang H; Li D; Wang C; Wang X; Yu M; Zhang X; Li L; Zeng Q; Long Z; Zheng W; Liu G; Wang D
Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 10(2):124. PubMed ID: 35282041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience.
Mendivil AA; Rettenmaier MA; Abaid LN; Brown JV; Micha JP; Lopez KL; Goldstein BH
Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26409687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
