These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28300640)

  • 1. Consistency of EEG source localization and connectivity estimates.
    Mahjoory K; Nikulin VV; Botrel L; Linkenkaer-Hansen K; Fato MM; Haufe S
    Neuroimage; 2017 May; 152():590-601. PubMed ID: 28300640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of the effective and functional human cortical connectivity with structural equation modeling and directed transfer function applied to high-resolution EEG.
    Astolfi L; Cincotti F; Mattia D; Salinari S; Babiloni C; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Ding L; Ni Y; He B; Marciani MG; Babiloni F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1457-70. PubMed ID: 15707795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of channel density, inverse solutions and connectivity measures on EEG resting-state networks reconstruction: A simulation study.
    Allouch S; Kabbara A; Duprez J; Khalil M; Modolo J; Hassan M
    Neuroimage; 2023 May; 271():120006. PubMed ID: 36914106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The New York Head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting.
    Huang Y; Parra LC; Haufe S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():150-62. PubMed ID: 26706450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of beamformer implementations for MEG source localization.
    Jaiswal A; Nenonen J; Stenroos M; Gramfort A; Dalal SS; Westner BU; Litvak V; Mosher JC; Schoffelen JM; Witton C; Oostenveld R; Parkkonen L
    Neuroimage; 2020 Aug; 216():116797. PubMed ID: 32278091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses.
    Cho JH; Vorwerk J; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():60-77. PubMed ID: 25638756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On noninvasive source imaging of the human K-complex.
    Wennberg R; Cheyne D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 May; 124(5):941-55. PubMed ID: 23200316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying the Effect of Demixing Approaches on Directed Connectivity Estimated Between Reconstructed EEG Sources.
    Anzolin A; Presti P; Van De Steen F; Astolfi L; Haufe S; Marinazzo D
    Brain Topogr; 2019 Jul; 32(4):655-674. PubMed ID: 30972604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sparse weightings for collapsing inverse solutions to cortical parcellations optimize M/EEG source reconstruction accuracy.
    Korhonen O; Palva S; Palva JM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Apr; 226():147-160. PubMed ID: 24509129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The FieldTrip-SimBio pipeline for EEG forward solutions.
    Vorwerk J; Oostenveld R; Piastra MC; Magyari L; Wolters CH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Mar; 17(1):37. PubMed ID: 29580236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Signal Propagation in the Human Visual Pathways: An Effective Connectivity Analysis.
    Youssofzadeh V; Prasad G; Fagan AJ; Reilly RB; Martens S; Meaney JF; Wong-Lin K
    J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(39):13501-10. PubMed ID: 26424894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional connectivity analysis in EEG source space: The choice of method.
    Barzegaran E; Knyazeva MG
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181105. PubMed ID: 28727750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of different cortical connectivity estimators for high-resolution EEG recordings.
    Astolfi L; Cincotti F; Mattia D; Marciani MG; Baccala LA; de Vico Fallani F; Salinari S; Ursino M; Zavaglia M; Ding L; Edgar JC; Miller GA; He B; Babiloni F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Feb; 28(2):143-57. PubMed ID: 16761264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A realistic, accurate and fast source modeling approach for the EEG forward problem.
    Miinalainen T; Rezaei A; Us D; Nüßing A; Engwer C; Wolters CH; Pursiainen S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():56-67. PubMed ID: 30165251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of Interictal Epileptic Networks from Dense-EEG.
    Hassan M; Merlet I; Mheich A; Kabbara A; Biraben A; Nica A; Wendling F
    Brain Topogr; 2017 Jan; 30(1):60-76. PubMed ID: 27549639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A critical assessment of connectivity measures for EEG data: a simulation study.
    Haufe S; Nikulin VV; Müller KR; Nolte G
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 64():120-33. PubMed ID: 23006806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Data-driven forward model inference for EEG brain imaging.
    Hansen ST; Hauberg S; Hansen LK
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 139():249-258. PubMed ID: 27307192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian Algorithm Based Localization of EEG Recorded Electromagnetic Brain Activity.
    Jatoi MA; Kamel N; Musavi SHA; López JD
    Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 31975664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.