These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28300960)

  • 1. Brazilian Portuguese Hearing in Noise Test (HINT): different interpretation criteria for individuals' responses.
    Melo RD; Menezes DC; Pacífico FA; Advíncula KP; Griz SM
    Codas; 2017 Mar; 29(1):e20160082. PubMed ID: 28300960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing in Noise Test, HINT-Brazil, in normal-hearing children.
    Novelli CL; Carvalho NG; Colella-Santos MF
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2018; 84(3):360-367. PubMed ID: 28549874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition.
    Hällgren M; Larsby B; Arlinger S
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):227-37. PubMed ID: 16684704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Relationship between Random Gap Detection and Hearing in Noise Test Performances.
    Heeke P; Vermiglio AJ; Bulla E; Velappan K; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):948-954. PubMed ID: 30479267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of the Cantonese Hearing In Noise Test (CHINT).
    Wong LL; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):276-89. PubMed ID: 15937409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Effects of Preprocessing Strategies for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Rakszawski B; Wright R; Cadieux JH; Davidson LS; Brenner C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):85-102. PubMed ID: 26905529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The MAndarin spoken word-Picture IDentification test in noise-Adaptive (MAPID-A) measures subtle speech-recognition-in-noise changes and spatial release from masking in very young children.
    Yuen KCP; Qiu XY; Mou HY; Xi X
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209768. PubMed ID: 30629627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bilingualism and speech recognition in silence and noise in adults.
    Ferreira GC; Torres EMO; Garcia MV; Santos SN; Costa MJ
    Codas; 2019; 31(5):e20180217. PubMed ID: 31644717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
    Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Aarnisalo AA; Vanhanen A; Hyyrynen T; Aaltonen O; Löppönen H; Zokoll MA; Kollmeier B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 24807850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age and measurement time-of-day effects on speech recognition in noise.
    Veneman CE; Gordon-Salant S; Matthews LJ; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):288-99. PubMed ID: 23187606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of recognition thresholds of sentences in quiet and in noise.
    Freitas CD; Lopes LF; Costa MJ
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2005; 71(5):624-30. PubMed ID: 16612524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The effect of musical practice on speech recognition in quiet and noisy situations].
    Soncini F; Costa MJ
    Pro Fono; 2006; 18(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 16927621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Content and procedural learning in repeated sentence tests of speech perception.
    Yund EW; Woods DL
    Ear Hear; 2010 Dec; 31(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 20562624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and validation of a smartphone-based digits-in-noise hearing test in South African English.
    Potgieter JM; Swanepoel de W; Myburgh HC; Hopper TC; Smits C
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 27121117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.