These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions. Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results. Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The restoration of cervical lesions with composite and acid-etching. Nathanson D Compend Contin Educ Dent (Lawrenceville); 1981; 2(5):302-6. PubMed ID: 6950866 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations. Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations. Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Four-year evaluation of the effect of 10% polyacrylic acid or water rinsing pretreatment on retention of glass polyalkenoate cement. van Dijken JW Eur J Oral Sci; 1996 Feb; 104(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 8653499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dentinogenesis imperfecta--a method of semipermanent restoration. Bow P J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1978 Jun; 33(6):293-300. PubMed ID: 287697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of dentine conditioning with polyacrylic acid on the clinical performance of glass ionomer cement--3-year results. Tyas MJ Aust Dent J; 1994 Aug; 39(4):220-1. PubMed ID: 7945049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Restoration of teeth with pathological attrition in patients with decreased occlusal height using adhesive materials. II. Clinical evaluation of several restorations]. Suliborski S Protet Stomatol; 1984; 34(6):295-300. PubMed ID: 6598635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations. Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Restoration of cervical wedge-shaped defect of teeth using sandwich technique of light cure composite and glass ionomer cement]. Xia SL Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2000 Jun; 25(3):313-4. PubMed ID: 12212185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive. Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):363-8. PubMed ID: 15002948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative analysis of techniques of restoring cervical lesions. Sidhu SK Quintessence Int; 1993 Aug; 24(8):553-9. PubMed ID: 8272493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system: results at five years. Tyas MJ; Burrow MF Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):438-41. PubMed ID: 12216560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]