380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28301684)
1. Economic evaluation of nivolumab as a second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma from US and Chinese perspectives.
Wan XM; Peng LB; Ma JA; Li YJ
Cancer; 2017 Jul; 123(14):2634-2641. PubMed ID: 28301684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost Effectiveness of Nivolumab in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Sarfaty M; Leshno M; Gordon N; Moore A; Neiman V; Rosenbaum E; Goldstein DA
Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):628-634. PubMed ID: 28807351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Additional Costs per Month of Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival: An Economic Model Comparing Everolimus with Cabozantinib, Nivolumab, and Axitinib for Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Swallow E; Messali A; Ghate S; McDonald E; Duchesneau E; Perez JR
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2018 Apr; 24(4):335-343. PubMed ID: 29578848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of everolimus for second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Serbia.
Mihajlović J; Pechlivanoglou P; Sabo A; Tomić Z; Postma MJ
Clin Ther; 2013 Dec; 35(12):1909-22. PubMed ID: 24238790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib Vs Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab as First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the US.
Watson TR; Gao X; Reynolds KL; Kong CY
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Oct; 3(10):e2016144. PubMed ID: 33052401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Axitinib, cabozantinib, everolimus, nivolumab, sunitinib and best supportive care in previously treated renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Edwards SJ; Wakefield V; Cain P; Karner C; Kew K; Bacelar M; Masento N; Salih F
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jan; 22(6):1-278. PubMed ID: 29393024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First-line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs Sunitinib for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
Wan X; Zhang Y; Tan C; Zeng X; Peng L
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Apr; 5(4):491-496. PubMed ID: 30789633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Economic evaluation of nivolumab for the treatment of second-line advanced squamous NSCLC in Canada: a comparison of modeling approaches to estimate and extrapolate survival outcomes.
Goeree R; Villeneuve J; Goeree J; Penrod JR; Orsini L; Tahami Monfared AA
J Med Econ; 2016 Jun; 19(6):630-44. PubMed ID: 26850122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nivolumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-Utility Analysis.
Raphael J; Sun Z; Bjarnason GA; Helou J; Sander B; Naimark DM
Am J Clin Oncol; 2018 Dec; 41(12):1235-1242. PubMed ID: 29727313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Economic evaluation of first-line nivolumab plus cabozantinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma in China.
Wang H; Wang Y; Li L; Zhou H; Lili S; Li L; Yike S; Aixia M
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():954264. PubMed ID: 36159269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reassessing the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma based on mature survival data, updated safety and lower comparator price.
Kim H; Goodall S; Liew D
J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):893-899. PubMed ID: 34259119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic evaluation of sunitinib malate for the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Remák E; Charbonneau C; Négrier S; Kim ST; Motzer RJ
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Aug; 26(24):3995-4000. PubMed ID: 18711190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy in advanced renal-cell carcinoma.
Wu B; Zhang Q; Sun J
J Immunother Cancer; 2018 Nov; 6(1):124. PubMed ID: 30458884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Economic evaluation of everolimus versus sorafenib for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma after failure of first-line sunitinib.
Casciano R; Chulikavit M; Di Lorenzo G; Liu Z; Baladi JF; Wang X; Robertson J; Garrison L
Value Health; 2011; 14(6):846-51. PubMed ID: 21914504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic evaluation of sunitinib malate in second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Finland.
Purmonen T; Martikainen JA; Soini EJ; Kataja V; Vuorinen RL; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL
Clin Ther; 2008 Feb; 30(2):382-92. PubMed ID: 18343276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Cost-effectiveness Analysis Comparing Pembrolizumab-Axitinib, Nivolumab-Ipilimumab, and Sunitinib for Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Chan A; Dang C; Wisniewski J; Weng X; Hynson E; Zhong L; Wilson L
Am J Clin Oncol; 2022 Feb; 45(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 34991104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost analysis for different sequential treatment regimens for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in China.
Shi G; Park SH; Ren H; Xue M; Lu X; Dong P; Gao X
J Med Econ; 2018 Dec; 21(12):1150-1158. PubMed ID: 30134758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Versus Sunitinib in First-Line Intermediate- to Poor-Risk Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Reinhorn D; Sarfaty M; Leshno M; Moore A; Neiman V; Rosenbaum E; Goldstein DA
Oncologist; 2019 Mar; 24(3):366-371. PubMed ID: 30710066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Economic evaluation of new targeted therapies for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Benedict A; Figlin RA; Sandström P; Harmenberg U; Ullén A; Charbonneau C; Sandin R; Remák E; Hariharan S; Négrier S
BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(5):665-72. PubMed ID: 21265994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Potential health gains for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in daily clinical practice: A real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of sequential first- and second-line treatments.
De Groot S; Blommestein HM; Redekop WK; Sleijfer S; Kiemeney LALM; Oosterwijk E; Uyl-de Groot CA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177364. PubMed ID: 28531203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
