These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28301726)

  • 1. Is the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism Accurate for Excitation Energies? Comparisons with TD-DFT, CASPT2, and EOM-CCSD.
    Jacquemin D; Duchemin I; Blase X
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2017 Apr; 8(7):1524-1529. PubMed ID: 28301726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy Assessment of GW Starting Points for Calculating Molecular Excitation Energies Using the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism.
    Gui X; Holzer C; Klopper W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Apr; 14(4):2127-2136. PubMed ID: 29499116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Excitation Energies from the Single-Particle Green's Function with the GW Approximation.
    Jin Y; Yang W
    J Phys Chem A; 2019 Apr; 123(14):3199-3204. PubMed ID: 30920830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Bethe-Salpeter Equation Formalism: From Physics to Chemistry.
    Blase X; Duchemin I; Jacquemin D; Loos PF
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2020 Sep; 11(17):7371-7382. PubMed ID: 32787315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combining Renormalized Singles
    Li J; Golze D; Yang W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Nov; 18(11):6637-6645. PubMed ID: 36279250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining localized orbital scaling correction and Bethe-Salpeter equation for accurate excitation energies.
    Li J; Jin Y; Su NQ; Yang W
    J Chem Phys; 2022 Apr; 156(15):154101. PubMed ID: 35459294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reference CC3 Excitation Energies for Organic Chromophores: Benchmarking TD-DFT, BSE/
    Knysh I; Lipparini F; Blondel A; Duchemin I; Blase X; Loos PF; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39237472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Excess and excited-state dipole moments of real-life dyes: a comparison between wave-function, BSE/
    Knysh I; Villalobos-Castro JDJ; Duchemin I; Blase X; Jacquemin D
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2023 Nov; 25(43):29993-30004. PubMed ID: 37905396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Communication: A hybrid Bethe-Salpeter/time-dependent density-functional-theory approach for excitation energies.
    Holzer C; Klopper W
    J Chem Phys; 2018 Sep; 149(10):101101. PubMed ID: 30219024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pros and Cons of the Bethe-Salpeter Formalism for Ground-State Energies.
    Loos PF; Scemama A; Duchemin I; Jacquemin D; Blase X
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2020 May; 11(9):3536-3545. PubMed ID: 32298578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Bethe-Salpeter equation in chemistry: relations with TD-DFT, applications and challenges.
    Blase X; Duchemin I; Jacquemin D
    Chem Soc Rev; 2018 Feb; 47(3):1022-1043. PubMed ID: 29250615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benchmark of Bethe-Salpeter for Triplet Excited-States.
    Jacquemin D; Duchemin I; Blondel A; Blase X
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Feb; 13(2):767-783. PubMed ID: 28107000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reference Energies for Intramolecular Charge-Transfer Excitations.
    Loos PF; Comin M; Blase X; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Jun; 17(6):3666-3686. PubMed ID: 33955742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Helium Atom Excitations by the GW and Bethe-Salpeter Many-Body Formalism.
    Li J; Holzmann M; Duchemin I; Blase X; Olevano V
    Phys Rev Lett; 2017 Apr; 118(16):163001. PubMed ID: 28474954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spin-Conserved and Spin-Flip Optical Excitations from the Bethe-Salpeter Equation Formalism.
    Monino E; Loos PF
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 May; 17(5):2852-2867. PubMed ID: 33724811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Critical Assessment of TD-DFT for Excited States of Open-Shell Systems: I. Doublet-Doublet Transitions.
    Li Z; Liu W
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2016 Jan; 12(1):238-60. PubMed ID: 26672389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Excited state potential energy surfaces of
    Knysh I; Letellier K; Duchemin I; Blase X; Jacquemin D
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2023 Mar; 25(12):8376-8385. PubMed ID: 36883347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling of excited state potential energy surfaces with the Bethe-Salpeter equation formalism: The 4-(dimethylamino)benzonitrile twist.
    Knysh I; Duchemin I; Blase X; Jacquemin D
    J Chem Phys; 2022 Nov; 157(19):194102. PubMed ID: 36414466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic benchmark of the ab initio Bethe-Salpeter equation approach for low-lying optical excitations of small organic molecules.
    Bruneval F; Hamed SM; Neaton JB
    J Chem Phys; 2015 Jun; 142(24):244101. PubMed ID: 26133404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening mixing GW/Bethe-Salpeter approach for triplet states of organic molecules.
    Ziaei V; Bredow T
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2018 Oct; 30(39):395501. PubMed ID: 30124435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.