176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28302461)
21. Overcoming boundaries of worldwide joint arthroplasty registers: the European Arthroplasty Register minimal dataset.
Sadoghi P; Leithner A; Labek G
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8):1327-8. PubMed ID: 23540540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validation of the diagnosis 'prosthetic joint infection' in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Gundtoft PH; Pedersen AB; Schønheyder HC; Overgaard S
Bone Joint J; 2016 Mar; 98-B(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 26920956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Joint registries as continuous surveillance systems: the experience of the Catalan Arthroplasty Register (RACat).
Allepuz A; Martínez O; Tebé C; Nardi J; Portabella F; Espallargues M;
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Mar; 29(3):484-90. PubMed ID: 24054907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of administrative coding in identifying hip and knee primary replacements and revisions.
Daneshvar P; Forster AJ; Dervin GF
J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Jun; 18(3):555-9. PubMed ID: 21223460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. First outcome results after total knee and hip replacement from the Lithuanian arthroplasty register.
Tarasevičius S; Cebatorius A; Valavičienė R; Stučinskas J; Leonas L; Robertsson O
Medicina (Kaunas); 2014; 50(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 25172602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Kaiser Permanente shoulder arthroplasty registry: results from 6,336 primary shoulder arthroplasties.
Dillon MT; Ake CF; Burke MF; Singh A; Yian EH; Paxton EW; Navarro RA
Acta Orthop; 2015 Jun; 86(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 25727949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cohort profile: the St Vincent's Melbourne Arthroplasty Outcomes (SMART) Registry, a pragmatic prospective database defining outcomes in total hip and knee replacement patients.
Gould D; Thuraisingam S; Shadbolt C; Knight J; Young J; Schilling C; Choong PF; Dowsey MM
BMJ Open; 2021 Jan; 11(1):e040408. PubMed ID: 33483441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement.
Baker PN; Petheram T; Avery PJ; Gregg PJ; Deehan DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):e126. PubMed ID: 22992855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Risk calculators predict failures of knee and hip arthroplasties: findings from a large health maintenance organization.
Paxton EW; Inacio MC; Khatod M; Yue E; Funahashi T; Barber T
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3965-73. PubMed ID: 26324831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Lessons learned from 25 years of an institutional hip and knee arthroplasty registry].
Lübbeke A; Baréa C; Miozzari H; Garavaglia G; Gonzalez A; Zingg M; Blatter-Sellak L; Renevey F; Bandi C; Hoffmeyer P; Hannouche D
Rev Med Suisse; 2021 Dec; 17(763):2161-2165. PubMed ID: 34910401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Creation and Validation of Linkage Between Orthopedic Registry and Administrative Data Using Indirect Identifiers.
Mao J; Etkin CD; Lewallen DG; Sedrakyan A
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jun; 34(6):1076-1081.e0. PubMed ID: 30803801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The influence of procedure volumes and standardization of care on quality and efficiency in total joint replacement surgery.
Bozic KJ; Maselli J; Pekow PS; Lindenauer PK; Vail TP; Auerbach AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2643-52. PubMed ID: 21084575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validation of a hospital-based joint registry: quantification of errors and maximizing utility.
Barr CJ; Barbalace RJ; Wessinger SJ; Bragdon CR; Kwon YM; Malchau H
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Dec; 27(10):1766-71. PubMed ID: 22743121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The progression of end-stage osteoarthritis: analysis of data from the Australian and Norwegian joint replacement registries using a multi-state model.
Gillam MH; Lie SA; Salter A; Furnes O; Graves SE; Havelin LI; Ryan P
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2013 Mar; 21(3):405-12. PubMed ID: 23274101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Development and Validation of Perioperative Risk-Adjustment Models for Hip Fracture Repair, Total Hip Arthroplasty, and Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Schilling PL; Bozic KJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 98(1):e2. PubMed ID: 26738909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Registry of shoulder arthroplasty - the Scottish experience.
Sharma S; Dreghorn CR
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2006 Mar; 88(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 16551397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How Much Do Adverse Event Rates Differ Between Primary and Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty?
Bohl DD; Samuel AM; Basques BA; Della Valle CJ; Levine BR; Grauer JN
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Mar; 31(3):596-602. PubMed ID: 26507527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Does preoperative mental health affect length of hospital stay and functional outcomes following arthroplasty surgery? A registry-based cohort study.
Singleton N; Poutawera V
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017; 25(2):2309499017718902. PubMed ID: 28673198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery.
Khatod M; Cafri G; Inacio MC; Schepps AL; Paxton EW; Bini SA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Mar; 97(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 25740025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Improvements in networking processes for hip or knee revision arthroplasty: a silver lining of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Chatterji U; Puttock D; Kheiran A; Sandean D; Mundy G; Menon D; Brown A
Hip Int; 2024 Mar; 34(2):168-173. PubMed ID: 37705235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
