BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28303288)

  • 1. [Technical advancements in cochlear implants : State of the art].
    Büchner A; Gärtner L
    HNO; 2017 Apr; 65(4):276-289. PubMed ID: 28303288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochlear implants: some likely next steps.
    Wilson BS; Lawson DT; Muller JM; Tyler RS; Kiefer J
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2003; 5():207-49. PubMed ID: 12704085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Future technology in cochlear implants: assessing the benefit.
    Briggs RJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 May; 12 Suppl 1():S22-5. PubMed ID: 21756467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [CILAB--a PC-based laboratory speech processor for implementation and evaluation of new stimulation strategies for cochlear implants].
    Mitterbacher A; Lampacher P; Zierhofer C; Hochmair E
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 Jun; 49(6):146-52. PubMed ID: 15279463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation : Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions].
    Rader T
    HNO; 2015 Feb; 63(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 25515123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Simulation of speech perception with cochlear implants : Influence of frequency and level of fundamental frequency components with electronic acoustic stimulation].
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 27670421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
    Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vibro-EAS: a proposal for electroacoustic stimulation.
    Schraven SP; Mlynski R; Dalhoff E; Wildenstein D; Alkonyi B; Gummer AW; Hagen R
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 25275865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade.
    von Ilberg CA; Baumann U; Kiefer J; Tillein J; Adunka OF
    Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16 Suppl 2():1-30. PubMed ID: 21606646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EAS-Combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
    Dhanasingh A; Hochmair I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 141(sup1):22-62. PubMed ID: 33818263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MED-EL Cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future.
    Hochmair I; Nopp P; Jolly C; Schmidt M; Schösser H; Garnham C; Anderson I
    Trends Amplif; 2006 Dec; 10(4):201-19. PubMed ID: 17172548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [New method of partial deafness treatment].
    Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2004; 58(4):811-6. PubMed ID: 15603395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Direct acoustic cochlear stimulation for therapy of severe to profound mixed hearing loss: Codacs™ Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant System].
    Lenarz T; Schwab B; Maier H; Kludt E
    HNO; 2014 Jul; 62(7):481-9. PubMed ID: 25056645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The current state and prospects of the development of cochlear implantation].
    Tavartkiladze GA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2015; 80(3):4-9. PubMed ID: 26331167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear Implant and Its Related Science.
    Hwang CF; Chen Y; Lin HC; Narayanan P; Oh SH; Truy E
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():683967. PubMed ID: 26240825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restoring hearing with active hearing implants.
    Federspil PA; Plinkert PK
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 Apr; 49(4):78-82. PubMed ID: 15171586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.