247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28303489)
1. In Vivo DCE-MRI for the Discrimination Between Glioblastoma and Radiation Necrosis in Rats.
Bolcaen J; Descamps B; Acou M; Deblaere K; den Broecke CV; Boterberg T; Vanhove C; Goethals I
Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Dec; 19(6):857-866. PubMed ID: 28303489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Kinetic Modeling and Graphical Analysis of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine (FCho), 18F-Fluoroethyltyrosine (FET) and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET for the Fiscrimination between High-Grade Glioma and Radiation Necrosis in Rats.
Bolcaen J; Lybaert K; Moerman L; Descamps B; Deblaere K; Boterberg T; Kalala JP; Van den Broecke C; De Vos F; Vanhove C; Goethals I
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161845. PubMed ID: 27559736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. (18)F-fluoromethylcholine (FCho), (18)F-fluoroethyltyrosine (FET), and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for the discrimination between high-grade glioma and radiation necrosis in rats: a PET study.
Bolcaen J; Descamps B; Deblaere K; Boterberg T; De Vos Pharm F; Kalala JP; Van den Broecke C; Decrock E; Leybaert L; Vanhove C; Goethals I
Nucl Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 42(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 25218024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation between quantitative and semiquantitative parameters in DCE-MRI with a blood pool agent in rectal cancer: can semiquantitative parameters be used as a surrogate for quantitative parameters?
Dijkhoff RAP; Maas M; Martens MH; Papanikolaou N; Lambregts DMJ; Beets GL; Beets-Tan RGH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 May; 42(5):1342-1349. PubMed ID: 28050622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective comparative diagnostic accuracy evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) vs. dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion in differentiating tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated high-grade gliomas.
Zakhari N; Taccone MS; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Sinclair J; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Cron GO; Thornhill RE; McInnes MDF; Nguyen TB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):573-582. PubMed ID: 30614146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distinguishing recurrent high-grade gliomas from radiation injury: a pilot study using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Bisdas S; Naegele T; Ritz R; Dimostheni A; Pfannenberg C; Reimold M; Koh TS; Ernemann U
Acad Radiol; 2011 May; 18(5):575-83. PubMed ID: 21419671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiparametric MRI for Differentiation of Radiation Necrosis From Recurrent Tumor in Patients With Treated Glioblastoma.
Nael K; Bauer AH; Hormigo A; Lemole M; Germano IM; Puig J; Stea B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 28952810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging for evaluation of angiogenesis of hepatocellular nodules in liver cirrhosis in N-nitrosodiethylamine induced rat model.
Zhang W; Chen HJ; Wang ZJ; Huang W; Zhang LJ
Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):2086-2094. PubMed ID: 27488851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnosis of Spinal Lesions Using Heuristic and Pharmacokinetic Parameters Measured by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.
Lang N; Yuan H; Yu HJ; Su MY
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):867-875. PubMed ID: 28162875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Application on the quantitative perfusion parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the pathological subtype of uterine leiomyoma].
Zheng J; Zhao ZH; Yang JF; Zhao L; Yang LM; Hu HJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 97(15):1155-1159. PubMed ID: 28427122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer detection on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: computer-aided diagnosis versus single perfusion parameter maps.
Sung YS; Kwon HJ; Park BW; Cho G; Lee CK; Cho KS; Kim JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):1122-9. PubMed ID: 22021504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Temporal Resolution on Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.
Othman AE; Falkner F; Weiss J; Kruck S; Grimm R; Martirosian P; Nikolaou K; Notohamiprodjo M
Invest Radiol; 2016 May; 51(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 26619282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semiquantitative and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging measurements predict radiation response in cervix cancer.
Zahra MA; Tan LT; Priest AN; Graves MJ; Arends M; Crawford RA; Brenton JD; Lomas DJ; Sala E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jul; 74(3):766-73. PubMed ID: 19019563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiation between glioblastoma and primary CNS lymphoma: application of DCE-MRI parameters based on arterial input function obtained from DSC-MRI.
Kang KM; Choi SH; Chul-Kee P; Kim TM; Park SH; Lee JH; Lee ST; Hwang I; Yoo RE; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9098-9109. PubMed ID: 34003350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Predictive value of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer].
Zhu YJ; Li Y; Jiang J; Zhang W; Xue LY; Zhou AP; Jiang LM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 41(10):765-770. PubMed ID: 31648499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The value of DCE-MRI in predicting IDH gene mutation of high-grade gliomas].
Lu HT; Xing W; Zhang YW; Qin HP; Wu RH; Ding JL
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 99(39):3105-3109. PubMed ID: 31648456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating glioblastoma, primary central nervous system lymphoma and brain metastatic tumor.
Lu S; Gao Q; Yu J; Li Y; Cao P; Shi H; Hong X
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1722-1727. PubMed ID: 27666608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiation between treatment-related changes and progressive disease in patients with high grade brain tumors using support vector machine classification based on DCE MRI.
Artzi M; Liberman G; Nadav G; Blumenthal DT; Bokstein F; Aizenstein O; Ben Bashat D
J Neurooncol; 2016 May; 127(3):515-24. PubMed ID: 26754857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Textural features of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI derived model-free and model-based parameter maps in glioma grading.
Xie T; Chen X; Fang J; Kang H; Xue W; Tong H; Cao P; Wang S; Yang Y; Zhang W
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1099-1111. PubMed ID: 28845594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of microvascular permeability with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of primary CNS lymphoma and glioblastoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Kickingereder P; Sahm F; Wiestler B; Roethke M; Heiland S; Schlemmer HP; Wick W; von Deimling A; Bendszus M; Radbruch A
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Aug; 35(8):1503-8. PubMed ID: 24722313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
