159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28303741)
1. Weight-of-the-evidence evaluation of 2,4-D potential for interactions with the estrogen, androgen and thyroid pathways and steroidogenesis.
Neal BH; Bus J; Marty MS; Coady K; Williams A; Staveley J; Lamb JC
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2017 May; 47(5):345-401. PubMed ID: 28303741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hypothesis-driven weight-of-evidence analysis of endocrine disruption potential: a case study with triclosan.
Mihaich E; Capdevielle M; Urbach-Ross D; Slezak B
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2017 Apr; 47(4):263-285. PubMed ID: 28128023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A hypothesis-driven weight-of-evidence analysis to evaluate potential endocrine activity of perfluorohexanoic acid.
Borghoff SJ; Fitch S; Rager JE; Huggett D
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Nov; 99():168-181. PubMed ID: 30240830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hypothesis-driven weight of evidence analysis to determine potential endocrine activity of MTBE.
de Peyster A; Mihaich E
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Aug; 69(3):348-70. PubMed ID: 24813373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of potential endocrine activity of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid using in vitro assays.
Coady KK; Kan HL; Schisler MR; Gollapudi BB; Neal B; Williams A; LeBaron MJ
Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Aug; 28(5):1018-25. PubMed ID: 24815817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Review and analysis of the potential for glyphosate to interact with the estrogen, androgen and thyroid pathways.
Levine SL; Webb EG; Saltmiras DA
Pest Manag Sci; 2020 Sep; 76(9):2886-2906. PubMed ID: 32608552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined toxicity of endocrine-disrupting chemicals: A review.
Hamid N; Junaid M; Pei DS
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 Jun; 215():112136. PubMed ID: 33735605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relevance weighting of tier 1 endocrine screening endpoints by rank order.
Borgert CJ; Stuchal LD; Mihaich EM; Becker RA; Bentley KS; Brausch JM; Coady K; Geter DR; Gordon E; Guiney PD; Hess F; Holmes CM; LeBaron MJ; Levine S; Marty S; Mukhi S; Neal BH; Ortego LS; Saltmiras DA; Snajdr S; Staveley J; Tobia A
Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2014 Feb; 101(1):90-113. PubMed ID: 24510745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New insights into the endocrine disrupting effects of brominated flame retardants.
Legler J
Chemosphere; 2008 Sep; 73(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 18667224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. NTP toxicity report of reproductive dose range-finding study of Genistein (CAS No. 446-72-0) administered in feed to Sprague-Dawley rats.
Delclos KB; Newbold R
Toxic Rep Ser; 2007 Nov; (79):1-C2. PubMed ID: 18685712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Alternatives to in vivo tests to detect endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in fish and amphibians--screening for estrogen, androgen and thyroid hormone disruption.
Scholz S; Renner P; Belanger SE; Busquet F; Davi R; Demeneix BA; Denny JS; Léonard M; McMaster ME; Villeneuve DL; Embry MR
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2013 Jan; 43(1):45-72. PubMed ID: 23190036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chlorpyrifos: weight of evidence evaluation of potential interaction with the estrogen, androgen, or thyroid pathways.
Juberg DR; Gehen SC; Coady KK; LeBaron MJ; Kramer VJ; Lu H; Marty MS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Aug; 66(3):249-63. PubMed ID: 23524272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Critical analysis of endocrine disruptive activity of triclosan and its relevance to human exposure through the use of personal care products.
Witorsch RJ
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2014 Jul; 44(6):535-55. PubMed ID: 24897554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hypothesis-driven weight-of-evidence analysis for the endocrine disruption potential of benzene.
Mihaich EM; Borgert CJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2018 Dec; 100():7-15. PubMed ID: 30273620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A predictive data-driven framework for endocrine prioritization: a triazole fungicide case study.
Paul Friedman K; Papineni S; Marty MS; Yi KD; Goetz AK; Rasoulpour RJ; Kwiatkowski P; Wolf DC; Blacker AM; Peffer RC
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2016 Oct; 46(9):785-833. PubMed ID: 27347635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-species conservation of endocrine pathways: a critical analysis of tier 1 fish and rat screening assays with 12 model chemicals.
Ankley GT; Gray LE
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Apr; 32(5):1084-7. PubMed ID: 23401061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing utility of thyroid in vitro screening assays through comparisons to observed impacts in vivo.
Eytcheson SA; Olker JH; Friedman KP; Hornung MW; Degitz SJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Oct; 144():105491. PubMed ID: 37666444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pronamide: Weight of evidence for potential estrogen, androgen or thyroid effects.
Marty MS; Papineni S; Coady KK; Rasoulpour RJ; Pottenger LH; Eisenbrandt DL
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Jul; 72(2):405-22. PubMed ID: 25846366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening chemicals for thyroid-disrupting activity: A critical comparison of mammalian and amphibian models.
Pickford DB
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 Nov; 40(10):845-92. PubMed ID: 20684730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Personal care products and endocrine disruption: A critical review of the literature.
Witorsch RJ; Thomas JA
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2010 Nov; 40 Suppl 3():1-30. PubMed ID: 20932229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
