BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1961 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28304237)

  • 1. Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months.
    Gornet MF; Lanman TH; Burkus JK; Hodges SD; McConnell JR; Dryer RF; Copay AG; Nian H; Harrell FE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jun; 26(6):653-667. PubMed ID: 28304237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Shaffrey ME; Argires PJ; Nian H; Harrell FE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Nov; 23(5):558-573. PubMed ID: 26230424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical disc arthroplasty: 10-year outcomes of the Prestige LP cervical disc at a single level.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Shaffrey ME; Schranck FW; Copay AG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 May; 31(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 31075769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Prestige LP artificial cervical disc replacement at 2 levels: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Lanman TH; Burkus JK; Dryer RG; Gornet MF; McConnell J; Hodges SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jul; 27(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 28387616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Heterotopic ossification following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results from the prospective, multicenter, historically controlled trial comparing allograft to an optimized dose of rhBMP-2.
    Arnold PM; Anderson KK; Selim A; Dryer RF; Kenneth Burkus J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Sep; 25(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 27129045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.
    Burkus JK; Traynelis VC; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):516-28. PubMed ID: 25036218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.
    Davis RJ; Nunley PD; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Jackson RJ; Bae HW; Hoffman GA; Gaede SE; Danielson GO; Gordon C; Stone MB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 25380538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lumbar disc arthroplasty versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion: 5-year outcomes for patients in the Maverick disc investigational device exemption study.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH; Schranck FW; Copay AG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 May; 31(3):347-356. PubMed ID: 31100723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.
    Davis RJ; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Gaede SE; Rashbaum RF; Nunley PD; Peterson DL; Stokes JK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):532-45. PubMed ID: 24010901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial.
    Radcliff K; Coric D; Albert T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):213-24. PubMed ID: 27015130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
    Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term Results Comparing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Wang QL; Tu ZM; Hu P; Kontos F; Li YW; Li L; Dai YL; Lv GH; Wang B
    Orthop Surg; 2020 Feb; 12(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 31863642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc.
    Coric D; Guyer RD; Nunley PD; Musante D; Carmody C; Gordon C; Lauryssen C; Boltes MO; Ohnmeiss DD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Mar; 28(3):252-261. PubMed ID: 29303467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial.
    Gornet MF; Lanman TH; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; McConnell JR; Hodges SD; Schranck FW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Jun; 31(4):508-518. PubMed ID: 31226684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?
    Chang PY; Chang HK; Wu JC; Huang WC; Fay LY; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 May; 26(5):577-585. PubMed ID: 28291414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Mummaneni PV; Burkus JK; Haid RW; Traynelis VC; Zdeblick TA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Mar; 6(3):198-209. PubMed ID: 17355018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study.
    Vaccaro A; Beutler W; Peppelman W; Marzluff JM; Highsmith J; Mugglin A; DeMuth G; Gudipally M; Baker KJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2227-39. PubMed ID: 24335629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Single-Level Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: Seven-Year Follow-up of the Prospective Randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.
    Janssen ME; Zigler JE; Spivak JM; Delamarter RB; Darden BV; Kopjar B
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Nov; 97(21):1738-47. PubMed ID: 26537161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial.
    Phillips FM; Lee JY; Geisler FH; Cappuccino A; Chaput CD; DeVine JG; Reah C; Gilder KM; Howell KM; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul; 38(15):E907-18. PubMed ID: 23591659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
    Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
    Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 99.