These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28304268)

  • 1. Empirical Evaluation of International Health System Data Interoperability: Mapping the Wanda Horta Theory to the Omaha System Ontology.
    Pruinelli L; Lucena A; Monsen KA
    Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2016 Aug; 30(3):229-241. PubMed ID: 28304268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Omaha system and meaningful use: applications for practice, education, and research.
    Martin KS; Monsen KA; Bowles KH
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2011; 29(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 21099545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mapping Out Point-of-Care Review Screens for Omaha System Data.
    Lee S
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2016 Feb; 34(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 26765656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mapping a Nursing Terminology Subset to openEHR Archetypes. A Case Study of the International Classification for Nursing Practice.
    Nogueira JR; Cook TW; Cavalini LT
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 25609209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rigor in electronic health record knowledge representation: Lessons learned from a SNOMED CT clinical content encoding exercise.
    Monsen KA; Finn RS; Fleming TE; Garner EJ; LaValla AJ; Riemer JG
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2016; 41(2):97-111. PubMed ID: 25325887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nursing Theory, Terminology, and Big Data: Data-Driven Discovery of Novel Patterns in Archival Randomized Clinical Trial Data.
    Monsen KA; Kelechi TJ; McRae ME; Mathiason MA; Martin KS
    Nurs Res; 2018; 67(2):122-132. PubMed ID: 29489633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interoperability of clinical decision-support systems and electronic health records using archetypes: a case study in clinical trial eligibility.
    Marcos M; Maldonado JA; Martínez-Salvador B; Boscá D; Robles M
    J Biomed Inform; 2013 Aug; 46(4):676-89. PubMed ID: 23707417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward semantic interoperability of electronic health records.
    Berges I; Bermúdez J; Illarramendi A
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2012 May; 16(3):424-31. PubMed ID: 22217917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Milestones and Experiences of Standardized Documentation.
    Saranto K; Saba V; Dykes P; Kinnunen UM; Mykkänen M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():748-9. PubMed ID: 27332328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between the VIPS model and the ICF for expressing nursing content in the health care record.
    Florin J; Ehrenberg A; Ehnfors M; Björvell C
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Feb; 82(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 22824196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nursing constraint models for electronic health records: a vision for domain knowledge governance.
    Hovenga E; Garde S; Heard S
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Dec; 74(11-12):886-98. PubMed ID: 16115795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A nursing information model process for interoperability.
    Chow M; Beene M; O'Brien A; Greim P; Cromwell T; DuLong D; Bedecarré D
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 May; 22(3):608-14. PubMed ID: 25656515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Public health nurse perceptions of Omaha System data visualization.
    Lee S; Kim E; Monsen KA
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Oct; 84(10):826-34. PubMed ID: 26187244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A national action plan for sharable and comparable nursing data to support practice and translational research for transforming health care.
    Westra BL; Latimer GE; Matney SA; Park JI; Sensmeier J; Simpson RL; Swanson MJ; Warren JJ; Delaney CW
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 May; 22(3):600-7. PubMed ID: 25670754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Urgent Call for Nursing Big Data.
    Delaney CW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():753-5. PubMed ID: 27332330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Viewpoint: use of King's conceptual system, nursing informatics, and nursing classification systems for global communication.
    Killeen MB; King IM
    Int J Nurs Terminol Classif; 2007; 18(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 17542861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The computerized OMAHA system in microsoft office excel.
    Lai X; Wong FK; Zhang P; Leung CW; Lee LH; Wong JS; Lo YF; Ching SS
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 201():310-4. PubMed ID: 24943560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using the Omaha System to describe health problems, interventions, and outcomes in home care in Istanbul, Turkey: a student informatics research experience.
    Erdogan S; Secginli S; Cosansu G; Nahcivan NO; Esin MN; Aktas E; Monsen KA
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2013 Jun; 31(6):290-8. PubMed ID: 23438865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electronic Health Records Data and Metadata: Challenges for Big Data in the United States.
    Sweet LE; Moulaison HL
    Big Data; 2013 Dec; 1(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 27447257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Messaging standard requirements for electronic health records in Islamic Republic of Iran: a Delphi study.
    Ahmadi M; Foozonkhah S; Shahmoradi L; Mahmodabadi AD
    East Mediterr Health J; 2017 Feb; 22(11):794-801. PubMed ID: 28177109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.