These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28307759)

  • 1. Habitat segregation in ungulates: are males forced into suboptimal foraging habitats through indirect competition by females?
    Conradt L; Clutton-Brock TH; Thomson D
    Oecologia; 1999 May; 119(3):367-377. PubMed ID: 28307759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex differences in weather sensitivity can cause habitat segregation: red deer as an example.
    Conradt L; Clutton-Brock TH; Guinness FE
    Anim Behav; 2000 May; 59(5):1049-1060. PubMed ID: 10860532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses.
    Ruckstuhl KE; Neuhaus P
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2002 Feb; 77(1):77-96. PubMed ID: 11911375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between habitat choice and lifetime reproductive success in female red deer.
    Conradt L; Clutton-Brock TH; Guinness FE
    Oecologia; 1999 Aug; 120(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 28308082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social segregation is not a consequence of habitat segregation in red deer and feral soay sheep.
    Conradt L
    Anim Behav; 1999 May; 57(5):1151-1157. PubMed ID: 10328803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in the Diets of Female and Male Red Deer: The Meaning for Sexual Segregation.
    Garcia F; Alves da Silva A; Ruckstuhl K; Neuhaus P; Coelho C; Wang M; Sousa JP; Alves J
    Biology (Basel); 2023 Mar; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 37106741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does the Jarman-Bell principle at intra-specific level explain sexual segregation in polygynous ungulates? Sex differences in forage digestibility in Soay sheep.
    Pérez-Barbería FJ; Pérez-Fernández E; Robertson E; Alvarez-Enríquez B
    Oecologia; 2008 Aug; 157(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 18481093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reconciling competing ecological explanations for sexual segregation in ungulates.
    Main MB
    Ecology; 2008 Mar; 89(3):693-704. PubMed ID: 18459333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Body size dimorphism and sexual segregation in polygynous ungulates: an experimental test with Soay sheep.
    Pérez-Barbería FJ; Gordon IJ
    Oecologia; 1999 Aug; 120(2):258-267. PubMed ID: 28308087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Foraging behaviour and sexual segregation in bighorn sheep.
    Ruckstuhl KE
    Anim Behav; 1998 Jul; 56(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 9710466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Male reproductive strategy explains spatiotemporal segregation in brown bears.
    Steyaert SM; Kindberg J; Swenson JE; Zedrosser A
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Jul; 82(4):836-45. PubMed ID: 23461483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Male group size, female distribution and changes in sexual segregation by Roosevelt elk.
    Peterson LM; Weckerly FW
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187829. PubMed ID: 29121076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex differences in giraffe foraging behavior at two spatial scales.
    Ginnett TF; Demment MW
    Oecologia; 1997 Apr; 110(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 28307437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual selection and senescence: male size-dimorphic ungulates evolved relatively smaller molars than females.
    Carranza J; Pérez-Barbería FJ
    Am Nat; 2007 Sep; 170(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17879188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of foraging behaviour in the sexual segregation of the African elephant.
    Shannon G; Page BR; Duffy KJ; Slotow R
    Oecologia; 2006 Nov; 150(2):344-54. PubMed ID: 16927101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple causes of sexual segregation in European red deer: enlightenments from varying breeding phenology at high and low latitude.
    Bonenfant C; Loe LE; Mysterud A; Langvatn R; Stenseth NC; Gaillard JM; Klein F
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 May; 271(1542):883-92. PubMed ID: 15255042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between tooth wear, habitat quality and late-life reproduction in a wild red deer population.
    Nussey DH; Metherell B; Moyes K; Donald A; Guinness FE; Clutton-Brock TH
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Mar; 76(2):402-12. PubMed ID: 17302848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual segregation of forage patch use: Support for the social-factors and predation hypotheses.
    Biggerstaff MT; Lashley MA; Chitwood MC; Moorman CE; DePerno CS
    Behav Processes; 2017 Mar; 136():36-42. PubMed ID: 28069490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Density-related changes in sexual selection in red deer.
    Clutton-Brock TH; Rose KE; Guinness FE
    Proc Biol Sci; 1997 Oct; 264(1387):1509-16. PubMed ID: 9364790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual segregation in vertebrates: proximate and ultimate causes.
    Ruckstuhl KE
    Integr Comp Biol; 2007 Aug; 47(2):245-57. PubMed ID: 21672835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.