These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28307860)

  • 1. The intensity of interference varies with food density: support for behaviour-based models of interference.
    Moody AL; Ruxton GD
    Oecologia; 1996 Nov; 108(3):446-449. PubMed ID: 28307860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The intensity of interference varies with resource density: evidence from a field study with snow buntings, Plectrophenax nivalis.
    Dolman PM
    Oecologia; 1995 Jun; 102(4):511-514. PubMed ID: 28306895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Moving on with foraging theory: incorporating movement decisions into the functional response of a gregarious shorebird.
    van Gils JA; van der Geest M; De Meulenaer B; Gillis H; Piersma T; Folmer EO
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Mar; 84(2):554-64. PubMed ID: 25283546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anthropogenically-Mediated Density Dependence in a Declining Farmland Bird.
    Dunn JC; Hamer KC; Benton TG
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139492. PubMed ID: 26431173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interference competition and the functional response of oystercatchers searching for cockles by touch.
    Norris K; Johnstone I
    Anim Behav; 1998 Sep; 56(3):639-650. PubMed ID: 9784213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Density dependence and the stabilization of animal numbers : 3. The winter moth reconsidered.
    den Boer PJ
    Oecologia; 1988 Mar; 75(2):161-168. PubMed ID: 28310829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linking optimal foraging behavior to bird community structure in an urban-desert landscape: field experiments with artificial food patches.
    Shochat E; Lerman SB; Katti M; Lewis DB
    Am Nat; 2004 Aug; 164(2):232-43. PubMed ID: 15278846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Field measurements give biased estimates of functional response parameters, but help explain foraging distributions.
    Duijns S; Knot IE; Piersma T; van Gils JA
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Mar; 84(2):565-75. PubMed ID: 25327649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determinants of spatial behavior of a tropical forest seed predator: The roles of optimal foraging, dietary diversification, and home range defense.
    Palminteri S; Powell GV; Peres CA
    Am J Primatol; 2016 May; 78(5):523-33. PubMed ID: 25807916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of bird-day carrying capacity on a staging site: a test of depletion models.
    Nolet BA; Gyimesi A; Klaassen RH
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Nov; 75(6):1285-92. PubMed ID: 17032360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How well do food distributions predict spatial distributions of shorebirds with different degrees of self-organization?
    Folmer EO; Olff H; Piersma T
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jul; 79(4):747-56. PubMed ID: 20337758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intake rates and the functional response in shorebirds (Charadriiformes) eating macro-invertebrates.
    Goss-Custard JD; West AD; Yates MG; Caldow RW; Stillman RA; Bardsley L; Castilla J; Castro M; Dierschke V; Durell SE; Eichhorn G; Ens BJ; Exo KM; Udayangani-Fernando PU; Ferns PN; Hockey PA; Gill JA; Johnstone I; Kalejta-Summers B; Masero JA; Moreira F; Nagarajan RV; Owens IP; Pacheco C; Perez-Hurtado A; Rogers D; Scheiffarth G; Sitters H; Sutherland WJ; Triplet P; Worrall DH; Zharikov Y; Zwarts L; Pettifor RA
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2006 Nov; 81(4):501-29. PubMed ID: 16863594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental functional response and inter-individual variation in foraging rate of teal (Anas crecca).
    Arzel C; Guillemain M; Gurd DB; Elmberg J; Fritz H; Arnaud A; Pin C; Bosca F
    Behav Processes; 2007 May; 75(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 17336000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring the functional responses of farmland birds: an example for a declining seed-feeding bunting.
    Smart SL; Stillman RA; Norris KJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 Jul; 77(4):687-95. PubMed ID: 18577020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of competitor density and physical habitat structure on the competitive intensity of territorial white spotted charr Salvelinus leucomaenis.
    Hasegawa K; Yamamoto S
    J Fish Biol; 2009 Jan; 74(1):213-9. PubMed ID: 20735534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feeding behavior and aggression in wild Siberut macaques (Macaca siberu) living under low predation risk.
    Richter C; Gras P; Hodges K; Ostner J; Schülke O
    Am J Primatol; 2015 Jul; 77(7):741-52. PubMed ID: 25736828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oscillations for a delayed predator-prey model with Hassell-Varley-type functional response.
    Xu C; Li P
    C R Biol; 2015 Apr; 338(4):227-40. PubMed ID: 25836016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of spatial grouping on the functional response of predators.
    Cosner C; DeAngelis DL; Ault JS; Olson DB
    Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Aug; 56(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 10438669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An experimental evaluation of competition between three species of intertidal prosobranch gastropods.
    Underwood AJ
    Oecologia; 1978 Jan; 33(2):185-202. PubMed ID: 28309163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the shape of the density-growth relationship for stream salmonids evidence for exploitative rather than interference competition?
    Ward DM; Nislow KH; Armstrong JD; Einum S; Folt CL
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Jan; 76(1):135-8. PubMed ID: 17184361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.