These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28312796)

  • 21. ADAPTIVE RESPONSES OF PREDATORS TO PREY AND PREY TO PREDATORS: THE FAILURE OF THE ARMS-RACE ANALOGY.
    Abrams PA
    Evolution; 1986 Nov; 40(6):1229-1247. PubMed ID: 28563514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How to analyse prey preference when prey density varies? A new method to discriminate between effects of gut fullness and prey type composition.
    Sabelis MW
    Oecologia; 1990 Mar; 82(3):289-298. PubMed ID: 28312701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intake rates and the functional response in shorebirds (Charadriiformes) eating macro-invertebrates.
    Goss-Custard JD; West AD; Yates MG; Caldow RW; Stillman RA; Bardsley L; Castilla J; Castro M; Dierschke V; Durell SE; Eichhorn G; Ens BJ; Exo KM; Udayangani-Fernando PU; Ferns PN; Hockey PA; Gill JA; Johnstone I; Kalejta-Summers B; Masero JA; Moreira F; Nagarajan RV; Owens IP; Pacheco C; Perez-Hurtado A; Rogers D; Scheiffarth G; Sitters H; Sutherland WJ; Triplet P; Worrall DH; Zharikov Y; Zwarts L; Pettifor RA
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2006 Nov; 81(4):501-29. PubMed ID: 16863594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prey size selection and cannibalistic behaviour of juvenile barramundi Lates calcarifer.
    Ribeiro FF; Qin JG
    J Fish Biol; 2015 May; 86(5):1549-66. PubMed ID: 25801794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Voracity and prey preference of insidious flower bug (hemiptera: anthocoridae) for immature stages of soybean aphid (hemiptera: aphididae) and soybean thrips (thysanoptera: thripidae).
    Butler CD; O'Neil RJ
    Environ Entomol; 2008 Aug; 37(4):964-72. PubMed ID: 18801262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Functional response and population dynamics for fighting predator, based on activity distribution.
    Garay J; Varga Z; Gámez M; Cabello T
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Mar; 368():74-82. PubMed ID: 25556688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Foraging time and spatial patterns of predation in experimental populations : A comparative study of three mite predator-prey systems (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae).
    Zhang ZQ; Sanderson JP; Nyrop JP
    Oecologia; 1992 May; 90(2):185-196. PubMed ID: 28313713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Trait-mediated functional responses: predator behavioural type mediates prey consumption.
    Toscano BJ; Griffen BD
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Nov; 83(6):1469-77. PubMed ID: 24749626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adaptive changes in prey vulnerability shape the response of predator populations to mortality.
    Abrams PA
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Nov; 261(2):294-304. PubMed ID: 19643111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predation in Gerris (Hemiptera): Reactive distances and locomotion rates.
    Jamieson GS; Scudder GG
    Oecologia; 1979 Dec; 44(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 28310456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fish predation on Notonecta (Hemiptera): relationship between prey risk and habitat utilization.
    Cook WL; Streams FA
    Oecologia; 1984 Oct; 64(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 28312336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Allometric functional response model: body masses constrain interaction strengths.
    Vucic-Pestic O; Rall BC; Kalinkat G; Brose U
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 19845811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Density-dependent effects of prey defenses and predator offenses.
    Jeschke JM
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Oct; 242(4):900-7. PubMed ID: 16842823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laboratory studies of predation by the Antarctic mite Gamasellus racovitzai (Acarina: Mesostigmata).
    Usher MB; Bowring MF
    Oecologia; 1984 May; 62(2):245-249. PubMed ID: 28310721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mixed encounters, limited perception and optimal foraging.
    Berec L
    Bull Math Biol; 2000 Sep; 62(5):849-68. PubMed ID: 11016087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Trait-mediated interactions: influence of prey size, density and experience.
    McCoy MW; Bolker BM
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 May; 77(3):478-86. PubMed ID: 18312336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stomach fullness modulates prey size choice in the frillfin goby, Bathygobius soporator.
    Tomida L; Lee JT; Barreto RE
    Zoology (Jena); 2012 Oct; 115(5):283-8. PubMed ID: 22951273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Understanding spatial distributions: negative density-dependence in prey causes predators to trade-off prey quantity with quality.
    Bijleveld AI; MacCurdy RB; Chan YC; Penning E; Gabrielson RM; Cluderay J; Spaulding EL; Dekinga A; Holthuijsen S; ten Horn J; Brugge M; van Gils JA; Winkler DW; Piersma T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Apr; 283(1828):. PubMed ID: 27053747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of light level on the functional response of a zooplanktonivorous fish.
    Townsend CR; Risebrow AJ
    Oecologia; 1982 Jun; 53(3):293-295. PubMed ID: 28311729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Climate, season, and social status modulate the functional response of an efficient stalking predator: the Eurasian lynx.
    Nilsen EB; Linnell JD; Odden J; Andersen R
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Jul; 78(4):741-51. PubMed ID: 19486380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.