These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28312796)
21. ADAPTIVE RESPONSES OF PREDATORS TO PREY AND PREY TO PREDATORS: THE FAILURE OF THE ARMS-RACE ANALOGY. Abrams PA Evolution; 1986 Nov; 40(6):1229-1247. PubMed ID: 28563514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How to analyse prey preference when prey density varies? A new method to discriminate between effects of gut fullness and prey type composition. Sabelis MW Oecologia; 1990 Mar; 82(3):289-298. PubMed ID: 28312701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prey size selection and cannibalistic behaviour of juvenile barramundi Lates calcarifer. Ribeiro FF; Qin JG J Fish Biol; 2015 May; 86(5):1549-66. PubMed ID: 25801794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Voracity and prey preference of insidious flower bug (hemiptera: anthocoridae) for immature stages of soybean aphid (hemiptera: aphididae) and soybean thrips (thysanoptera: thripidae). Butler CD; O'Neil RJ Environ Entomol; 2008 Aug; 37(4):964-72. PubMed ID: 18801262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Functional response and population dynamics for fighting predator, based on activity distribution. Garay J; Varga Z; Gámez M; Cabello T J Theor Biol; 2015 Mar; 368():74-82. PubMed ID: 25556688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Foraging time and spatial patterns of predation in experimental populations : A comparative study of three mite predator-prey systems (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae). Zhang ZQ; Sanderson JP; Nyrop JP Oecologia; 1992 May; 90(2):185-196. PubMed ID: 28313713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Density-dependent effects of prey defenses and predator offenses. Jeschke JM J Theor Biol; 2006 Oct; 242(4):900-7. PubMed ID: 16842823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laboratory studies of predation by the Antarctic mite Gamasellus racovitzai (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Usher MB; Bowring MF Oecologia; 1984 May; 62(2):245-249. PubMed ID: 28310721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mixed encounters, limited perception and optimal foraging. Berec L Bull Math Biol; 2000 Sep; 62(5):849-68. PubMed ID: 11016087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Trait-mediated interactions: influence of prey size, density and experience. McCoy MW; Bolker BM J Anim Ecol; 2008 May; 77(3):478-86. PubMed ID: 18312336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Stomach fullness modulates prey size choice in the frillfin goby, Bathygobius soporator. Tomida L; Lee JT; Barreto RE Zoology (Jena); 2012 Oct; 115(5):283-8. PubMed ID: 22951273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Understanding spatial distributions: negative density-dependence in prey causes predators to trade-off prey quantity with quality. Bijleveld AI; MacCurdy RB; Chan YC; Penning E; Gabrielson RM; Cluderay J; Spaulding EL; Dekinga A; Holthuijsen S; ten Horn J; Brugge M; van Gils JA; Winkler DW; Piersma T Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Apr; 283(1828):. PubMed ID: 27053747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The influence of light level on the functional response of a zooplanktonivorous fish. Townsend CR; Risebrow AJ Oecologia; 1982 Jun; 53(3):293-295. PubMed ID: 28311729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Climate, season, and social status modulate the functional response of an efficient stalking predator: the Eurasian lynx. Nilsen EB; Linnell JD; Odden J; Andersen R J Anim Ecol; 2009 Jul; 78(4):741-51. PubMed ID: 19486380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]