117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28313379)
1. Density effects of flowering phenology and mating potential in Nicotiana alata.
Lyons EE; Mully TW
Oecologia; 1992 Aug; 91(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 28313379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The strength of assortative mating for flowering date and its basis in individual variation in flowering schedule.
Weis AE; Nardone E; Fox GA
J Evol Biol; 2014 Oct; 27(10):2138-51. PubMed ID: 25186618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Among-individual variation in flowering phenology affects flowering synchrony and mating opportunity.
Shelton WR; Mitchell RJ; Christopher DA; Jack LP; Karron JD
Am J Bot; 2024 Jan; 111(1):e16269. PubMed ID: 38126922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mating between Echinacea angustifolia (Asteraceae) individuals increases with their flowering synchrony and spatial proximity.
Ison JL; Wagenius S; Reitz D; Ashley MV
Am J Bot; 2014 Jan; 101(1):180-9. PubMed ID: 24388964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ASSORTATIVE MATING AND NATURAL SELECTION IN AN IRIS HYBRID ZONE.
Cruzan MB; Arnold ML
Evolution; 1994 Dec; 48(6):1946-1958. PubMed ID: 28565161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Density-dependent flowering phenology, outcrossing, and reproduction in Impatiens capensis.
Schmitt J; Eccleston J; Ehrhardt DW
Oecologia; 1987 Jun; 72(3):341-347. PubMed ID: 28311127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic variation in flowering time induces phenological assortative mating: quantitative genetic methods applied to Brassica rapa.
Weis AE; Kossler TM
Am J Bot; 2004 Jun; 91(6):825-36. PubMed ID: 21653438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Individual flowering phenology, plant size, and reproductive success in Linanthus androsaceus, a California annual.
Schmitt J
Oecologia; 1983 Aug; 59(1):135-40. PubMed ID: 25024159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phenological change in a spring ephemeral: implications for pollination and plant reproduction.
Gezon ZJ; Inouye DW; Irwin RE
Glob Chang Biol; 2016 May; 22(5):1779-93. PubMed ID: 26833694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CONSTANCY OF POPULATION PARAMETERS FOR LIFE-HISTORY AND FLORAL TRAITS IN RAPHANUS SATIVUS L. II. EFFECTS OF PLANTING DENSITY ON PHENOTYPE AND HERITABILITY ESTIMATES.
Mazer SJ; Schick CT
Evolution; 1991 Dec; 45(8):1888-1907. PubMed ID: 28563970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct and indirect assortative mating: a multivariate approach to plant flowering schedules.
Weis AE
J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):536-46. PubMed ID: 15842483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrasting effects of warming and increased snowfall on Arctic tundra plant phenology over the past two decades.
Bjorkman AD; Elmendorf SC; Beamish AL; Vellend M; Henry GH
Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Dec; 21(12):4651-61. PubMed ID: 26216538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Herbivory and natural selection on flowering phenology in wild sunflower, Helianthus annuus.
Pilson D
Oecologia; 2000 Jan; 122(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 28307959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of phenological variation in sex expression on female reproductive success in Saxifraga granulata.
van der Meer S; Jacquemyn H
Am J Bot; 2015 Dec; 102(12):2116-23. PubMed ID: 26656126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating the impact of divergent mating phenology between residents and migrants on the potential for gene flow.
Bonner C; Sokolov NA; Westover SE; Ho M; Weis AE
Ecol Evol; 2019 Apr; 9(7):3770-3783. PubMed ID: 31015965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limited alpine climatic warming and modeled phenology advancement for three alpine species in the Northeast United States.
Kimball KD; Davis ML; Weihrauch DM; Murray GL; Rancourt K
Am J Bot; 2014 Sep; 101(9):1437-46. PubMed ID: 25253704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phenological variation in fruit characteristics in vertebrate-dispersed plants.
Eriksson O; Ehrlén J
Oecologia; 1991 May; 86(4):463-470. PubMed ID: 28313326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assortative mating can help adaptation of flowering time to a changing climate: Insights from a polygenic model.
Godineau C; Ronce O; Devaux C
J Evol Biol; 2022 Apr; 35(4):491-508. PubMed ID: 33794053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assortative mating and differential male mating success in an ash hybrid zone population.
Gérard PR; Klein EK; Austerlitz F; Fernández-Manjarrés JF; Frascaria-Lacoste N
BMC Evol Biol; 2006 Nov; 6():96. PubMed ID: 17107611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maintenance of temporal synchrony between syrphid flies and floral resources despite differential phenological responses to climate.
Iler AM; Inouye DW; Høye TT; Miller-Rushing AJ; Burkle LA; Johnston EB
Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Aug; 19(8):2348-59. PubMed ID: 23640772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
