These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28314238)

  • 1. Paternity testing and other inference about relationships from DNA mixtures.
    Green PJ; Mortera J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():128-137. PubMed ID: 28314238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pedigree-based relationship inference from complex DNA mixtures.
    Dørum G; Kaur N; Gysi M
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 May; 131(3):629-641. PubMed ID: 28101646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Paternity testing that involves a DNA mixture.
    Mortera J; Vecchiotti C; Zoppis S; Merigioli S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jul; 23():50-54. PubMed ID: 27017109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship inference based on DNA mixtures.
    Kaur N; Bouzga MM; Dørum G; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Mar; 130(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 26541994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Casework applications of probabilistic genotyping methods for DNA mixtures that allow relationships between contributors.
    Green PJ; Mortera J; Prieto L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102482. PubMed ID: 33640736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating mutation rates from paternity casework.
    Vicard P; Dawid AP; Mortera J; Lauritzen SL
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jan; 2(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 19083784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems.
    Dawid AP; Mortera J; Vicard P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jul; 169(2-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 17055679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A general approach to power calculation for relationship testing.
    Egeland T; Pinto N; Vigeland MD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():186-90. PubMed ID: 23810238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Choosing supplementary markers in forensic casework.
    Tillmar AO; Mostad P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():128-33. PubMed ID: 25113577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The analogy between DNA kinship and DNA mixture evaluation, with applications for the interpretation of likelihood ratios produced by possibly imperfect models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102449. PubMed ID: 33517022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A parametric approach to kinship hypothesis testing using identity-by-descent parameters.
    García-Magariños M; Egeland T; López-de-Ullibarri I; Hjort NL; Salas A
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2015 Nov; 14(5):465-79. PubMed ID: 26509786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring the efficacy of paternity and kinship testing based on single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Mo SK; Liu YC; Wang SQ; Bo XC; Li Z; Chen Y; Ni M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():161-168. PubMed ID: 26952733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Joint Bayesian analysis of forensic mixtures.
    Pascali VL; Merigioli S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):735-48. PubMed ID: 22948016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validating TrueAllele
    Bauer DW; Butt N; Hornyak JM; Perlin MW
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):380-398. PubMed ID: 31580496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
    Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ForeStatistics: A windows-based feature-rich software program for performing statistics in forensic DNA analysis, paternity and relationship testing.
    Rasool N; Hussain W
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Feb; 307():110142. PubMed ID: 31927396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A large-scale validation of NOCIt's a posteriori probability of the number of contributors and its integration into forensic interpretation pipelines.
    Grgicak CM; Karkar S; Yearwood-Garcia X; Alfonse LE; Duffy KR; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102296. PubMed ID: 32339916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exact computation of the distribution of likelihood ratios with forensic applications.
    Dørum G; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Haned H; Snipen L; Sæbø S; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():93-101. PubMed ID: 24528587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DNA mixture genotyping by probabilistic computer interpretation of binomially-sampled laser captured cell populations: combining quantitative data for greater identification information.
    Ballantyne J; Hanson EK; Perlin MW
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 23601717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.