501 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28314891)
1. Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation.
Fedorka CJ; Chen AF; Pagnotto MR; Crossett LS; Klatt BA
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 28314891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Loss in Revision TKA.
Watters TS; Martin JR; Levy DL; Yang CC; Kim RH; Dennis DA
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3468-3473. PubMed ID: 28697864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cementless Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves Used for Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Short- to Mid-Term Outcomes.
Shen J; Zhang T; Zhang Y; Dong Y; Zhou Y; Guo L
Orthop Surg; 2023 Feb; 15(2):488-495. PubMed ID: 36479829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision total knee arthroplasty using metaphyseal sleeves at short-term follow-up.
Huang R; Barrazueta G; Ong A; Orozco F; Jafari M; Coyle C; Austin M
Orthopedics; 2014 Sep; 37(9):e804-9. PubMed ID: 25350623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Septic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Treatment of Metaphyseal Bone Defects Using Metaphyseal Sleeves.
Klim SM; Amerstorfer F; Bernhardt GA; Sadoghi P; Gruber G; Radl R; Leithner A; Glehr M
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Dec; 33(12):3734-3738. PubMed ID: 30224100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Excellent mid-term osseointegration and implant survival using metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Klim SM; Amerstorfer F; Bernhardt GA; Sadoghi P; Hauer G; Leitner L; Leithner A; Glehr M
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Dec; 28(12):3843-3848. PubMed ID: 32006076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Chalmers BP; Desy NM; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Taunton MJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1565-1570. PubMed ID: 28109761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases.
Gill UN; Ahmed N; Noor SS; Memon IA; Memon ZA
Int Orthop; 2020 Nov; 44(11):2315-2320. PubMed ID: 32556384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mid-term results for metaphyseal sleeves in revision knee surgery.
Martin-Hernandez C; Floria-Arnal LJ; Muniesa-Herrero MP; Espallargas-Doñate T; Blanco-Llorca JA; Guillen-Soriano M; Ranera-Garcia M
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Dec; 25(12):3779-3785. PubMed ID: 27639879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distribution of Bone Ongrowth in Metaphyseal Sleeves for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis.
Ihekweazu UN; Weitzler L; Wright TM; Padgett DE
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Apr; 34(4):760-765. PubMed ID: 30718170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Knee revision arthroplasty : cementless, metaphyseal fixation with sleeves].
Graichen H; Strauch M; Scior W; Morgan-Jones R
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2015 Feb; 27(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 25620192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Short-term effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve and MBT implant].
Guo L; Du Y; Zhang M; Sun J; Jin Z; Peng Y; Shen J; Zhou Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 33(3):302-306. PubMed ID: 30874385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of stepped porous titanium metaphyseal sleeves for tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term results.
Barnett SL; Mayer RR; Gondusky JS; Choi L; Patel JJ; Gorab RS
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1219-24. PubMed ID: 24444570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Osteointegrative Sleeves for Metaphyseal Defect Augmentation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiological 5-Year Follow-Up.
Wirries N; Winnecken HJ; Lewinski GV; Windhagen H; Skutek M
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Sep; 34(9):2022-2029. PubMed ID: 31079992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Heidenreich MJ; Lanting BA; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 35257822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement.
Meneghini RM; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jan; 90(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 18171960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report.
Rossi SMP; Perticarini L; Ghiara M; Jannelli E; Cortesi L; Benazzo F
Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():175-182. PubMed ID: 35349974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study.
Bolognesi MP; Pietrobon R; Clifford PE; Vail TP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Dec; 86(12):2720-5. PubMed ID: 15590859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cementless metaphyseal sleeves used for large tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Alexander GE; Bernasek TL; Crank RL; Haidukewych GJ
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Apr; 28(4):604-7. PubMed ID: 23123042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
