These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28315170)

  • 1. Meeting the challenge of the Psychonomic Society's 2012 Guidelines on Statistical Issues: Some success and some room for improvement.
    Morris PE; Fritz CO
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28315170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Power, effects, confidence, and significance: an investigation of statistical practices in nursing research.
    Gaskin CJ; Happell B
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2014 May; 51(5):795-806. PubMed ID: 24207028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting and Guidelines in Propensity Score Analysis: A Systematic Review of Cancer and Cancer Surgical Studies.
    Yao XI; Wang X; Speicher PJ; Hwang ES; Cheng P; Harpole DH; Berry MF; Schrag D; Pang HH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Aug; 109(8):. PubMed ID: 28376195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of statistical reporting in developmental disability journals.
    Namasivayam AK; Yan T; Wong WY; van Lieshout P
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2015 Dec; 38(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 26478965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors' reporting of statistics and use of open research practices: Five years later.
    Giofrè D; Boedker I; Cumming G; Rivella C; Tressoldi P
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; 55(7):3845-3854. PubMed ID: 36253598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals.
    Parsons NR; Hiskens R; Price CL; Achten J; Costa ML
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Sep; 93(9):1154-9. PubMed ID: 21911523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survey of editors and reviewers of high-impact psychology journals: statistical and research design problems in submitted manuscripts.
    Harris A; Reeder R; Hyun J
    J Psychol; 2011; 145(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 21560804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond inference by eye: Statistical and graphing practices in JEAB, 1992-2017.
    Kyonka EGE; Mitchell SH; Bizo LA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Mar; 111(2):155-165. PubMed ID: 30747443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Failure to Report Effect Sizes: The Handling of Quantitative Results in Published Health Education and Behavior Research.
    Barry AE; Szucs LE; Reyes JV; Ji Q; Wilson KL; Thompson B
    Health Educ Behav; 2016 Oct; 43(5):518-27. PubMed ID: 27624442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation.
    Fritz CO; Morris PE; Richler JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 Feb; 141(1):2-18. PubMed ID: 21823805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical power and effect sizes of clinical neuropsychology research.
    Bezeau S; Graves R
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2001 Jun; 23(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 11419453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
    Nielsen MB; Seitz K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of the effect size in JCR Spanish journals of psychology: from theory to fact.
    García García J; Ortega Campos E; De la Fuente Sánchez L
    Span J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 14(2):1050-5. PubMed ID: 22059347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can't make them think: statistical reform lessons from medicine.
    Fidler F; Thomason N; Cumming G; Finch S; Leeman J
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Feb; 15(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 14738519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The value of RCT evidence depends on the quality of statistical analysis.
    Faulkner C; Fidler F; Cumming G
    Behav Res Ther; 2008 Feb; 46(2):270-81. PubMed ID: 18191102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of the reporting and handling of missing data in cohort studies with repeated assessment of exposure measures.
    Karahalios A; Baglietto L; Carlin JB; English DR; Simpson JA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jul; 12():96. PubMed ID: 22784200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of statistical procedures used in papers in the Australian Veterinary Journal.
    McCance I
    Aust Vet J; 1995 Sep; 72(9):322-8. PubMed ID: 8585846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An assessment of the statistical procedures used in original papers published in the SAMJ during 1992.
    Becker PJ; Viljoen E; Wolmarans L; IJsselmuiden CB
    S Afr Med J; 1995 Sep; 85(9):881-4. PubMed ID: 8545749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved Data Reporting in RQES: from volumes 49, 59, to 84.
    Thomas JR
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2014 Dec; 85(4):446-8. PubMed ID: 25412125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event-related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability.
    Clayson PE; Carbine KA; Baldwin SA; Larson MJ
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Nov; 56(11):e13437. PubMed ID: 31322285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.