210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28315607)
1. Correcting bias due to missing stage data in the non-parametric estimation of stage-specific net survival for colorectal cancer using multiple imputation.
Falcaro M; Carpenter JR
Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 48():16-21. PubMed ID: 28315607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating excess hazard ratios and net survival when covariate data are missing: strategies for multiple imputation.
Falcaro M; Nur U; Rachet B; Carpenter JR
Epidemiology; 2015 May; 26(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 25774607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer net survival on registry data: use of the new unbiased Pohar-Perme estimator and magnitude of the bias with the classical methods.
Roche L; Danieli C; Belot A; Grosclaude P; Bouvier AM; Velten M; Iwaz J; Remontet L; Bossard N
Int J Cancer; 2013 May; 132(10):2359-69. PubMed ID: 22961565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term net survival in patients with colorectal cancer in France: an informative contribution of recent methodology.
Rollot F; Chauvenet M; Roche L; Hamza S; Lepage C; Faivre J; Bouvier AM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Oct; 56(10):1118-24. PubMed ID: 24022528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Choosing the net survival method for cancer survival estimation.
Seppä K; Hakulinen T; Pokhrel A
Eur J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 51(9):1123-9. PubMed ID: 24183462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple imputation with missing indicators as proxies for unmeasured variables: simulation study.
Sperrin M; Martin GP
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):185. PubMed ID: 32640992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imputation of missing values of tumour stage in population-based cancer registration.
Eisemann N; Waldmann A; Katalinic A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Sep; 11():129. PubMed ID: 21929796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing net survival estimators of cancer patients.
Seppä K; Hakulinen T; Läärä E; Pitkäniemi J
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1866-79. PubMed ID: 26707551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of Multiple Imputation Using Modern Machine Learning Methods in Electronic Health Records Data.
Getz K; Hubbard RA; Linn KA
Epidemiology; 2023 Mar; 34(2):206-215. PubMed ID: 36722803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The performance of multiple imputation for missing covariate data within the context of regression relative survival analysis.
Giorgi R; Belot A; Gaudart J; Launoy G;
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(30):6310-31. PubMed ID: 19021241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conditional net survival: Relevant prognostic information for colorectal cancer survivors. A French population-based study.
Drouillard A; Bouvier AM; Rollot F; Faivre J; Jooste V; Lepage C
Dig Liver Dis; 2015 Jul; 47(7):597-601. PubMed ID: 25911573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temporal and geographic changes in stage at diagnosis in England during 2008-2013: A population-based study of colorectal, lung and ovarian cancers.
Muller P; Woods L; Walters S
Cancer Epidemiol; 2020 Aug; 67():101743. PubMed ID: 32535409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple imputation to minimise bias from missing stage information in estimates of early cancer diagnosis in England: a population-based study.
Muller P; Woods L
Cancer Epidemiol; 2022 Aug; 79():102198. PubMed ID: 35724558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fair comparisons of cause-specific and relative survival by accounting for the systematic removal of patients from risk-sets.
Wells M; Rutherford MJ; Lambert PC
Cancer Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 86():102408. PubMed ID: 37591148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of imputation methods for handling missing covariate data when fitting a Cox proportional hazards model: a resampling study.
Marshall A; Altman DG; Holder RL
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Dec; 10():112. PubMed ID: 21194416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modelling relative survival in the presence of incomplete data: a tutorial.
Nur U; Shack LG; Rachet B; Carpenter JR; Coleman MP
Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Feb; 39(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 19858106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recovery of information from multiple imputation: a simulation study.
Lee KJ; Carlin JB
Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 9(1):3. PubMed ID: 22695083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is using multiple imputation better than complete case analysis for estimating a prevalence (risk) difference in randomized controlled trials when binary outcome observations are missing?
Mukaka M; White SA; Terlouw DJ; Mwapasa V; Kalilani-Phiri L; Faragher EB
Trials; 2016 Jul; 17():341. PubMed ID: 27450066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends in age-standardised net survival of stomach cancer by subsite and stage: A population-based study in Osaka, Japan, 2001-2014.
Saito MK; Nakata K; Kato M; Kuwabara Y; Morishima T; Rachet B; Miyashiro I
Cancer Epidemiol; 2022 Aug; 79():102170. PubMed ID: 35525121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trends in population-based cancer survival in Slovenia.
Zadnik V; Zagar T; Lokar K; Tomsic S; Konjevic AD; Zakotnik B
Radiol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 55(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 33885247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
