167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28316135)
1. Variability of cut-off values for the detection of lupus anticoagulants: results of an international multicenter multiplatform study.
Tripodi A; Chantarangkul V; Cini M; Devreese K; Dlott JS; Giacomello R; Gray E; Legnani C; Martinuzzo ME; Pradella P; Siegemund A; Subramanian S; Suchon P; Testa S
J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Jun; 15(6):1180-1190. PubMed ID: 28316135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of different methods for outlier detection and rejection when calculating cut off values for diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants.
Chantarangkul V; Peyvandi F; Tripodi A;
Thromb Res; 2020 Jun; 190():20-25. PubMed ID: 32272277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variability among commercial batches of normal pooled plasma in lupus anticoagulant testing.
Cabo J; Morimont L; Baudar J; Guldenpfennig M; Jacqmin H; Soleimani R; Lecompte T; Douxfils J; Mullier F
Int J Lab Hematol; 2023 Feb; 45(1):126-136. PubMed ID: 36222181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laboratory diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants for patients on oral anticoagulant treatment. Performance of dilute Russell viper venom test and silica clotting time in comparison with Staclot LA.
Tripodi A; Chantarangkul V; Clerici M; Mannucci PM
Thromb Haemost; 2002 Oct; 88(4):583-6. PubMed ID: 12362227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Applying index of circulating anticoagulant to mixing tests with lupus anticoagulant screen and confirm reagents can distinguish with high specificity between lupus anticoagulants and direct factor Xa inhibitors.
Kumano O; Amiral J; Dunois C; Peyrafitte M; Moore GW
Int J Lab Hematol; 2021 Aug; 43(4):771-778. PubMed ID: 33974363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lupus anticoagulant laboratory diagnosis by applying the 2020 ISTH-SSC guidelines.
Talon L; Fourneyron V; Senectaire S; Tardieu M; Tillier M; Trapani A; Trayaud A; Vaissade A; Sapin AF; Lebreton A; Sinegre T
Thromb Res; 2023 Apr; 224():38-45. PubMed ID: 36827954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New guidelines for lupus anticoagulant: sensitivity and specificity of cut-off values calculated with plasmas from healthy controls in mixing and confirmatory tests.
Martinuzzo ME; Cerrato GS; Varela ML; Adamczuk YP; Forastiero RR
Int J Lab Hematol; 2012 Apr; 34(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 22032515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mixing test specific cut-off is more sensitive at detecting lupus anticoagulants than index of circulating anticoagulant.
Moore GW; Culhane AP; Daw CR; Noronha CP; Kumano O
Thromb Res; 2016 Mar; 139():98-101. PubMed ID: 26916303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of six dilute russell viper venom time lupus anticoagulant screen/confirm assay kits.
McGlasson DL; Fritsma GA
Semin Thromb Hemost; 2013 Apr; 39(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 23468380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The activated seven lupus anticoagulant assay detects clinically significant antibodies.
Moore GW; Rangarajan S; Savidge GF
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2008 Jul; 14(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 17895508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cooperation experience in a multicentre study to define the upper limits in a normal population for the diagnostic assessment of the functional lupus anticoagulant assays.
Pradella P; Azzarini G; Santarossa L; Caberlotto L; Bardin C; Poz A; D'Aurizio F; Giacomello R
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 51(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 23001319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical importance of positive test results for lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies.
Proven A; Bartlett RP; Moder KG; Chang-Miller A; Cardel LK; Heit JA; Homburger HA; Petterson TM; Christianson TJ; Nichols WL
Mayo Clin Proc; 2004 Apr; 79(4):467-75. PubMed ID: 15065611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of DOAC-Stop on lupus anticoagulant testing in plasma samples of venous thromboembolism patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants.
Ząbczyk M; Kopytek M; Natorska J; Undas A
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 Aug; 57(9):1374-1381. PubMed ID: 30763261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MIXCON-LA: a precise, sensitive and specific aPTT-based assay for detection of lupus anticoagulant.
Lindhoff-Last E; Humpich M; Schmitt J; Rödiger S; Seifried E; Bauersachs R
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2002 Apr; 8(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 12121058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The dilution effect of equal volume mixing studies compromises confirmation of inhibition by lupus anticoagulants even when mixture specific reference ranges are applied.
Moore GW; Savidge GF
Thromb Res; 2006; 118(4):523-8. PubMed ID: 16263154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Potentially clinically important inaccuracies in testing for the lupus anticoagulant: an analysis of results from three surveys of the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) for Blood Coagulation.
Jennings I; Kitchen S; Woods TA; Preston FE; Greaves M
Thromb Haemost; 1997 May; 77(5):934-7. PubMed ID: 9184405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of silica clotting time method for lupus anticoagulant in a clinical population with various symptoms of antiphospholipid syndrome.
Averina M; Johannesen S; Brox J
Lupus; 2016 Apr; 25(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 26612052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lupus anticoagulant: performance of the tests as recommended by the latest ISTH guidelines.
Swadzba J; Iwaniec T; Pulka M; De Laat B; De Groot PG; Musial J
J Thromb Haemost; 2011 Sep; 9(9):1776-83. PubMed ID: 21707912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Kaolin clotting time and dilute Russell's viper venom time distinguish between prothrombin-dependent and beta 2-glycoprotein I-dependent antiphospholipid antibodies.
Galli M; Finazzi G; Bevers EM; Barbui T
Blood; 1995 Jul; 86(2):617-23. PubMed ID: 7605991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Paired APTTs of low and high lupus anticoagulant sensitivity permit distinction from other abnormalities and achieve good lupus anticoagulant detection rates in conjunction with dRVVT.
Kumano O; Amiral J; Dunois C; Peyrafitte M; Moore GW
Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Feb; 41(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 30248243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
