BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28317002)

  • 21. Formative Evaluation of Participant Experience With Mobile eConsent in the App-Mediated Parkinson mPower Study: A Mixed Methods Study.
    Doerr M; Maguire Truong A; Bot BM; Wilbanks J; Suver C; Mangravite LM
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Feb; 5(2):e14. PubMed ID: 28209557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An evaluation of the process of informed consent: views from research participants and staff.
    O' Sullivan L; Feeney L; Crowley RK; Sukumar P; McAuliffe E; Doran P
    Trials; 2021 Aug; 22(1):544. PubMed ID: 34407858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Enhancement of surgical informed consent by addition of repeat back: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Fink AS; Prochazka AV; Henderson WG; Bartenfeld D; Nyirenda C; Webb A; Berger DH; Itani K; Whitehill T; Edwards J; Wilson M; Karsonovich C; Parmelee P
    Ann Surg; 2010 Jul; 252(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 20562609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quality assurance questionnaire for professionals fails to improve the quality of informed consent.
    Lavori PW; Wilt TJ; Sugarman J
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(6):638-49. PubMed ID: 18042573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Randomization to standard and concise informed consent forms: development of evidence-based consent practices.
    Enama ME; Hu Z; Gordon I; Costner P; Ledgerwood JE; Grady C;
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Sep; 33(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 22542645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents.
    Jefford M; Moore R
    Lancet Oncol; 2008 May; 9(5):485-93. PubMed ID: 18452859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The quality of parental consent for research with children: a prospective repeated measure self-report survey.
    Franck LS; Winter I; Oulton K
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 May; 44(4):525-33. PubMed ID: 16712850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Education level, primary language, and comprehension of the informed consent process.
    Breese PE; Burman WJ; Goldberg S; Weis SE
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2007 Dec; 2(4):69-79. PubMed ID: 19385809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prospective evaluation of patient comprehension of informed consent.
    Crepeau AE; McKinney BI; Fox-Ryvicker M; Castelli J; Penna J; Wang ED
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Oct; 93(19):e114(1-7). PubMed ID: 22005875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Recommendations for communication to enhance informed consent and enrolment at multilingual research sites.
    Penn C; Evans M
    Afr J AIDS Res; 2009 Sep; 8(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 25864544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Towards better-informed consent: Research with livestock-keepers and informal traders in East Africa.
    Cooper TL; Kirino Y; Alonso S; Lindahl J; Grace D
    Prev Vet Med; 2016 Jun; 128():135-41. PubMed ID: 27237399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Enhancing the "informed" in informed consent: a pilot test of a multimedia presentation.
    Wanzer MB; Wojtaszczyk AM; Schimert J; Missert L; Baker S; Baker R; Dunkle B
    Health Commun; 2010 Jun; 25(4):365-74. PubMed ID: 20512718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing a Multimedia Digital Informed Consent Tool With Traditional Paper-Based Methods: Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Abujarad F; Peduzzi P; Mun S; Carlson K; Edwards C; Dziura J; Brandt C; Alfano S; Chupp G
    JMIR Form Res; 2021 Oct; 5(10):e20458. PubMed ID: 34665142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials.
    Daugherty CK; Ratain MJ; Minami H; Banik DM; Vogelzang NJ; Stadler WM; Siegler M
    J Clin Oncol; 1998 Jul; 16(7):2305-12. PubMed ID: 9667244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing the impact of a modified informed consent process in a South African HIV/AIDS research trial.
    Penn C; Evans M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2010 Aug; 80(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 19963332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing the National Cancer Institute's Original and Revised Consent Form Templates.
    Masset HA; Hiser M; Atkinson NL; Brittle C; Bailey R; Adler J; Mishkin GE; Denicoff AM; Roach N; Good M; Burgess D; Patrick L; Mooney M; Abrams JS
    IRB; 2017; 39(5):1-7. PubMed ID: 30703315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of repeated testing upon comprehension of informed consent materials by elderly volunteers.
    Taub HA; Baker MT
    Exp Aging Res; 1983; 9(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 6641771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A survey of study participants' understanding of informed consent to participate in a randomised controlled trial of acupuncture.
    Smith CA; Fogarty S
    BMC Complement Altern Med; 2016 Jan; 16():10. PubMed ID: 26753767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Testing an alternate informed consent process.
    Yates BC; Dodendorf D; Lane J; LaFramboise L; Pozehl B; Duncan K; Knodel K
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 19289935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Informed consent for research: a study to evaluate readability and processability to effect change.
    Philipson SJ; Doyle MA; Gabram SG; Nightingale C; Philipson EH
    J Investig Med; 1995 Oct; 43(5):459-67. PubMed ID: 8528757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.