251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28317684)
1. Comparison of the performance and safety of 2 ophthalmic viscosurgical devices in cataract surgery.
Auffarth GU; Auerbach FN; Rabsilber T; Gegúndez JA; Cuiña R; Renard Y; Vinciguerra P; Camesasca F; Van Cauwenberge F; Amzallag T; Van Setten G; Holzer MP
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 28317684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery without OVD: a prospective intraindividual comparison.
Schargus M; Suckert N; Schultz T; Kakkassery V; Dick HB
J Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 31(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 25751829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the effect of Viscoat and DuoVisc on postoperative intraocular pressure after small-incision cataract surgery.
Rainer G; Stifter E; Luksch A; Menapace R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):253-7. PubMed ID: 18242449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Healon5 and 4 other viscoelastic substances on intraocular pressure and endothelium after cataract surgery.
Holzer MP; Tetz MR; Auffarth GU; Welt R; Völcker HE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2001 Feb; 27(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 11226784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical comparison of Healon5 and Healon in phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation; Randomized multicenter study.
Oshika T; Eguchi S; Oki K; Yaguchi S; Bissen-Miyajima H; Ota I; Sugita G; Miyata K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Feb; 30(2):357-62. PubMed ID: 15030824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of a bacterially derived sodium hyaluronate 2.3% ophthalmic viscosurgical device.
Chang DH; Christie WC; Loden JC; Smith PJ; Jackson BE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1789-1796. PubMed ID: 31856991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of corneal endothelial cell loss during phacoemulsification using continuous anterior chamber infusion versus those using ophthalmic viscosurgical device: randomized controlled trial.
Nayak BK; Jain EK
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2009; 57(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 19237781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two techniques for toric intraocular lens implantation: hydroimplantation versus ophthalmic viscosurgical devices.
Chen Y; Cao Q; Xue C; Huang Z
BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 29699518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety of hydroimplantation: a foldable intraocular lens implantation without the use of an ophthalmic viscosurgical device.
Studeny P; Hyndrak M; Kacerovsky M; Mojzis P; Sivekova D; Kuchynka P
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2014; 24(6):850-6. PubMed ID: 24846622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of a new cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device on corneal protection and intraocular pressure in small-incision cataract surgery.
Neumayer T; Prinz A; Findl O
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1362-6. PubMed ID: 18655988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Viscoat versus Visthesia during phacoemulsification cataract surgery: corneal and foveal changes.
Moschos MM; Chatziralli IP; Sergentanis TN
BMC Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 11():9. PubMed ID: 21529354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and effectiveness of a new ophthalmic viscosurgical device: randomized, controlled study.
Packer M; Berdahl JP; Goldberg DF; Hosten L; Lau G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1050-1056. PubMed ID: 35137696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of viscoelastic substances used in cataract surgery on corneal metabolism and endothelial morphology: comparison of Healon and Viscoat.
Maár N; Graebe A; Schild G; Stur M; Amon M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2001 Nov; 27(11):1756-61. PubMed ID: 11709248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hydroimplantation versus viscoimplantation: comparison of intraocular lens implantation with and without ophthalmic viscoelastic device in phacoemulsification.
Özcura F; Çevik S
Rom J Ophthalmol; 2018; 62(4):282-287. PubMed ID: 30891524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraocular pressure after bilateral cataract surgery using Healon, Healon5, and Healon GV.
Arshinoff SA; Albiani DA; Taylor-Laporte J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Apr; 28(4):617-25. PubMed ID: 11955901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clinical comparison between DisCoVisc and 2% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose in phacoemulsification: a fellow eye study.
Espíndola RF; Castro EF; Santhiago MR; Kara-Junior N
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2012 Sep; 67(9):1059-62. PubMed ID: 23018304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of antiglaucoma agents on postoperative intraocular pressure after cataract surgery with Viscoat.
Borazan M; Karalezli A; Akman A; Akova YA
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1941-5. PubMed ID: 17964402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative Evaluation of Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery with and without the Use of Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices.
Joshi RS; Naik SR
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2020; 27(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 32549724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraocular pressure development in the rabbit eye after aqueous exchange with ophthalmic viscosurgical devices.
Törngren L; Lundgren B; Madsen K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2000 Aug; 26(8):1247-52. PubMed ID: 11008057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thickness of the Protective Layers of Different Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices During Lens Surgery in a Porcine Model.
Wüst M; Matten P; Nenning M; Findl O
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Feb; 11(2):28. PubMed ID: 35175318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
