324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28319213)
1. Comparison of the Marginal Fit of Cobalt-Chromium Metal-Ceramic Crowns Fabricated by CAD/CAM Techniques and Conventional Methods at Three Production Stages.
Real-Voltas F; Romano-Cardozo E; Figueras-Alvarez O; Brufau-de Barbera M; Cabratosa-Termes J
Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(3):304–305. PubMed ID: 28319213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of porcelain firing and cementation on the marginal fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations fabricated by additive or subtractive manufacturing methods.
Yildirim B
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):476.e1-476.e6. PubMed ID: 32451142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Internal fit of single crowns produced by CAD-CAM and lost-wax metal casting technique assessed by the triple-scan protocol.
Dahl BE; Rønold HJ; Dahl JE
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):400-404. PubMed ID: 27692584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems.
Kim EH; Lee DH; Kwon SM; Kwon TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 27677219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of manufacturing technique on marginal fit of cobalt chromium restorations: An
Sarda AS; Bedia SV
Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 35645078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns.
Tamac E; Toksavul S; Toman M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 24819532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns in CAD/CAM and lost-wax techniques in all fabrication stages through replica weighting, triple scanning, and scanning electron microscope.
Sadr SM; Ahmadi E; Tabatabaei MH; Mohammadi S; Atri F
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Jun; 8(3):763-770. PubMed ID: 35187813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of marginal/internal fit of chrome-cobalt crowns: Direct laser metal sintering versus computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing.
Gunsoy S; Ulusoy M
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(5):636-44. PubMed ID: 27538553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of marginal and internal gaps of metal ceramic crowns obtained from conventional impressions and casting techniques with those obtained from digital techniques.
Rai R; Kumar SA; Prabhu R; Govindan RT; Tanveer FM
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(3):291-297. PubMed ID: 28721994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the marginal discrepancy of PFM crowns in the CAD/CAM and lost-wax fabrication techniques by triple scanning.
Ahmadi E; Tabatabaei MH; Sadr SM; Atri F
Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(4):417-422. PubMed ID: 33444489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal fit of 3-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures: Influence of pattern fabrication method and repeated porcelain firings.
Giti R; Farrahi P
PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0301799. PubMed ID: 38625846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques.
Papadiochou S; Pissiotis AL
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):545-551. PubMed ID: 28967399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of marginal fit of single implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns prepared by using presintered metal blocks.
Pasali B; Sarac D; Kaleli N; Sarac YS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):257-262. PubMed ID: 28545869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of fabrication stages and cementation on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns.
Kale E; Yilmaz B; Seker E; Özcelik TB
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):736-741. PubMed ID: 28434679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
