BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28319783)

  • 1. Development of an evaluation framework for publicly funded R&D projects: The case of Korea's Next Generation Network.
    Kim E; Kim S; Kim H
    Eval Program Plann; 2017 Aug; 63():18-28. PubMed ID: 28319783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of logic models in a large scientific research program.
    O'Keefe CM; Head RJ
    Eval Program Plann; 2011 Aug; 34(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 21555041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Public project success as seen in a broad perspective.: Lessons from a meta-evaluation of 20 infrastructure projects in Norway.
    Volden GH
    Eval Program Plann; 2018 Aug; 69():109-117. PubMed ID: 29775924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Korea's National Health Insurance--lessons from the past three decades.
    Jeong HS
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2011 Jan; 30(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 21209449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of a database for government-funded health/functional food research.
    Kim JY; Park J; Kwon O
    J Med Food; 2009 Dec; 12(6):1185-9. PubMed ID: 20041770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structural equation model for the evaluation of national funding on R&D project of SMEs in consideration with MBNQA criteria.
    Sohn SY; Gyu Joo Y; Kyu Han H
    Eval Program Plann; 2007 Feb; 30(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 17689310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of technological competence and operations efficiency in the defense industry: The strategic planning of South Korea.
    Lee JG; Park MJ
    Eval Program Plann; 2020 Apr; 79():101775. PubMed ID: 31865011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Data-driven analysis on the performance evaluation of national R&D projects in Korea.
    Cho H; Ahn H; Park E
    Eval Program Plann; 2024 Feb; 102():102383. PubMed ID: 37924729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach.
    Varmazyar M; Dehghanbaghi M; Afkhami M
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Oct; 58():125-140. PubMed ID: 27371786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating a national science and technology program using the human capital and relational asset perspectives.
    Hung CL; Chou JC; Roan HW
    Eval Program Plann; 2010 Nov; 33(4):487-97. PubMed ID: 20193964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. South Korea's scientists seek change amid political chaos.
    Zastrow M
    Nature; 2017 Mar; 543(7646):474-475. PubMed ID: 28332544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using the Nine Common Themes of Good Practice checklist as a tool for evaluating the research priority setting process of a provincial research and program evaluation program.
    Mador RL; Kornas K; Simard A; Haroun V
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Mar; 14():22. PubMed ID: 27006075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: design and application of an evaluation method.
    Walter AI; Helgenberger S; Wiek A; Scholz RW
    Eval Program Plann; 2007 Nov; 30(4):325-38. PubMed ID: 17904636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To boost South Korea's basic science, look to values, not just budgets.
    Kim SY
    Nature; 2022 Jun; 606(7913):229. PubMed ID: 35650296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Private sector joins family planning effort.
    Front Lines; 1989 Dec; ():6, 13. PubMed ID: 12343476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incorporating equity considerations in transport infrastructure evaluation: Current practice and a proposed methodology.
    Thomopoulos N; Grant-Muller S; Tight MR
    Eval Program Plann; 2009 Nov; 32(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 19647318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevention validation and accounting platform: a framework for establishing accountability and performance measures of substance abuse prevention programs.
    Kim S; McLeod JH; Williams C; Hepler N
    J Drug Educ; 2000; 30(1):1-143. PubMed ID: 10893910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and application of course-embedded assessment system for program outcome evaluation in the Korean nursing education: A pilot study.
    Park JW; Seo EJ; You MA; Song JE
    Nurse Educ Today; 2016 Mar; 38():48-53. PubMed ID: 26804941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The researcher development program: how to extend the involvement of Australian general practitioners in research?
    Birden HH
    Rural Remote Health; 2007; 7(3):776. PubMed ID: 17696757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The development of European Union common research and development policy and programs with special regard to life sciences].
    Pörzse G
    Orv Hetil; 2009 Aug; 150(32):1509-22. PubMed ID: 19632918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.