These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

597 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28321169)

  • 1. Inflammatory bowel disease: An evaluation of health information on the internet.
    Azer SA; AlOlayan TI; AlGhamdi MA; AlSanea MA
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 23(9):1676-1696. PubMed ID: 28321169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.
    Azer SA; Alghofaili MM; Alsultan RM; Alrumaih NS
    J Cancer Educ; 2018 Aug; 33(4):926-944. PubMed ID: 28281091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
    Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of web-based information on inflammatory bowel diseases.
    van der Marel S; Duijvestein M; Hardwick JC; van den Brink GR; Veenendaal R; Hommes DW; Fidder HH
    Inflamm Bowel Dis; 2009 Dec; 15(12):1891-6. PubMed ID: 19462423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
    Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
    JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
    Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument.
    Kaicker J; Borg Debono V; Dang W; Buckley N; Thabane L
    BMC Med; 2010 Oct; 8():59. PubMed ID: 20939875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Your patient information website: how good is it?
    Soobrah R; Clark SK
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Mar; 14(3):e90-4. PubMed ID: 21883807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
    Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
    Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.
    Vives M; Young L; Sabharwal S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2826-31. PubMed ID: 19910867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cosmetic facial surgery: are online resources reliable and do patients understand them?
    Awal DH; Mills C
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 56(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 29307586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.
    Reynolds M; Hoi A; Buchanan RRC
    Lupus; 2018 Oct; 27(12):1911-1917. PubMed ID: 30114969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A North American perspective of content and quality of websites in the English language on childhood-onset lupus erythematosus.
    Cutler C; Peng T; Stinson J; Tucker L; Boneparth A; Klein Gitelman M; Moorthy LN
    Lupus; 2018 Apr; 27(5):762-770. PubMed ID: 29256340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea.
    Chi E; Jabbour N; Aaronson NL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jul; 98():1-3. PubMed ID: 28583484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material on Websites of Breast Imaging Centers.
    Choudhery S; Xi Y; Chen H; Aboul-Fettouh N; Goldenmerry Y; Ho C; Viroslav H; Zhang C; Goudreau S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Oct; 17(10):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 32428435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality, Reliability, Technical Quality, and Readability of Google Online Information on Childhood Glaucoma.
    Elhusseiny AM; Hassan AK; Hassan MA; Eleiwa TK; Ali HT; Abdelnaem S; Chauhan MZ; Shaikh O; Khouri AS; Sallam AB
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2024; 61(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 38112390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Separating the Wheat From the Chaff: An Evaluation of Readability, Quality, and Accuracy of Online Health Information for Treatment of Peyronie Disease.
    Bompastore NJ; Cisu T; Holoch P
    Urology; 2018 Aug; 118():59-64. PubMed ID: 29723588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.