These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28321289)

  • 1. Art Perception in the Museum: How We Spend Time and Space in Art Exhibitions.
    Carbon CC
    Iperception; 2017; 8(1):2041669517694184. PubMed ID: 28321289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ecological Art Experience: How We Can Gain Experimental Control While Preserving Ecologically Valid Settings and Contexts.
    Carbon CC
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():800. PubMed ID: 32499736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of labels in digital art experience: psychophysiological and behavioral evidence.
    Castellotti S; D'Agostino O; Del Viva MM
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1342667. PubMed ID: 39011289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Viewing Art in Different Contexts.
    Estrada-Gonzalez V; East S; Garbutt M; Spehar B
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():569. PubMed ID: 32300320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Art in time and space: context modulates the relation between art experience and viewing time.
    Brieber D; Nadal M; Leder H; Rosenberg R
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99019. PubMed ID: 24892829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing a Calibration - Free Eye Tracker Prototype at the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna.
    Dare Z; Brinkmann H; Rosenberg R
    J Eye Mov Res; 2020 Nov; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 33828790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterizing the emotional response to art beyond pleasure: Correspondence between the emotional characteristics of artworks and viewers' emotional responses.
    Tinio PPL; Gartus A
    Prog Brain Res; 2018; 237():319-342. PubMed ID: 29779742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Capturing Aesthetic Experiences With Installation Art: An Empirical Assessment of Emotion, Evaluations, and Mobile Eye Tracking in Olafur Eliasson's "Baroque, Baroque!".
    Pelowski M; Leder H; Mitschke V; Specker E; Gerger G; Tinio PPL; Vaporova E; Bieg T; Husslein-Arco A
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1255. PubMed ID: 30127756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of visual context and individual differences on perception and evaluation of modern art and graffiti art.
    Gartus A; Klemer N; Leder H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Mar; 156():64-76. PubMed ID: 25700235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of contextual information on aesthetic engagement of artworks.
    Darda KM; Chatterjee A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4273. PubMed ID: 36922537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In the white cube: museum context enhances the valuation and memory of art.
    Brieber D; Nadal M; Leder H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jan; 154():36-42. PubMed ID: 25481660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aesthetic Evaluation of Digitally Reproduced Art Images.
    Reymond C; Pelowski M; Opwis K; Takala T; Mekler ED
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():615575. PubMed ID: 33362676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frames as visual links between paintings and the museum environment: an analysis of statistical image properties.
    Redies C; Groß F
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():831. PubMed ID: 24265625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does Gallery Lighting Really Have an Impact on Appreciation of Art? An Ecologically Valid Study of Lighting Changes and the Assessment and Emotional Experience With Representational and Abstract Paintings.
    Pelowski M; Graser A; Specker E; Forster M; von Hinüber J; Leder H
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2148. PubMed ID: 31636577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychophysiological and behavioral responses to descriptive labels in modern art museums.
    Castellotti S; D'Agostino O; Mencarini A; Fabozzi M; Varano R; Mastandrea S; Baldriga I; Del Viva MM
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0284149. PubMed ID: 37134073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Display Makes a Difference: A Mobile Eye Tracking Study on the Perception of Art Before and After a Museum's Rearrangement.
    Reitstätter L; Brinkmann H; Santini T; Specker E; Dare Z; Bakondi F; Miscená A; Kasneci E; Leder H; Rosenberg R
    J Eye Mov Res; 2020 Jun; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 33828792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How the Visitors' Cognitive Engagement Is Driven (but Not Dictated) by the Visibility and Co-visibility of Art Exhibits.
    Krukar J; Dalton RC
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():350. PubMed ID: 32194488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining the gray cube effect on naïve viewers' appreciation of street-based art in Hong Kong and Poland.
    Szubielska M; Ho R; Witeska-Młynarczyk A; Kopiś-Posiej N
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):4099. PubMed ID: 38374285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sharing Perspectives: Inviting Playful Curiosity Into Museum Spaces Through a Performative Score.
    Løppenthin A; Bjerre Jensen D; Vesper C; Roepstorff A; Dumit J
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():825625. PubMed ID: 35756237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. But Is It really Art? The Classification of Images as "Art"/"Not Art" and Correlation with Appraisal and Viewer Interpersonal Differences.
    Pelowski M; Gerger G; Chetouani Y; Markey PS; Leder H
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1729. PubMed ID: 29062292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.