These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28321685)

  • 61. Federal inquiry finds misconduct by a discoverer of the AIDS virus.
    Hilts P
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Dec; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists' Engagement in Questionable Research Practices.
    Sacco DF; Bruton SV; Brown M
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 29179623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Commentary: A delicate balance: weighing the effects of conflict-of-interest rules on intramural research at the National Institutes of Health.
    Gottesman MM; Jaffe HB
    Acad Med; 2010 Nov; 85(11):1660-2. PubMed ID: 20980848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.
    Pascal CB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Embryo cloners jumped the gun.
    Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5193):1949. PubMed ID: 11644654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Social norms and its correlates as a pathway to smoking among young Latino adults.
    Echeverría SE; Gundersen DA; Manderski MT; Delnevo CD
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Jan; 124():187-95. PubMed ID: 25461876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Research project on ear infections dramatizes challenge of conflicts.
    Cordes C
    Chron High Educ; 1993 Mar; 39(26):A23, A28. PubMed ID: 11656295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
    Price AR
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Misconduct in research administration: What is it? How widespread is it? And what should we do about it?
    Robert JS
    Account Res; 2023 Dec; 30(7):439-458. PubMed ID: 34989302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Hero in exposing science hoax paid dearly.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A1, B6. PubMed ID: 11646838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. "I am innocent," embattled biologist says.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jun; ():C1, C10. PubMed ID: 11646863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Acculturation in the discourse of immigrants and receiving community members: Results from a cross-national qualitative study.
    Fedi A; Mannarini T; Brodsky A; Rochira A; Buckingham S; Emery L; Godsay S; Scheibler J; Miglietta A; Gattino S
    Am J Orthopsychiatry; 2019; 89(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 29792478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Perceptions of occurrence of research misconduct and related factors among Kenyan investigators engaged in HIV research.
    Were E; Kaguiri E; Kiplagat J
    Account Res; 2020 Aug; 27(6):372-389. PubMed ID: 32324050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Exploring researchers' perspectives on authorship decision making.
    Maggio LA; Artino AR; Watling CJ; Driessen EW; O'Brien BC
    Med Educ; 2019 Dec; 53(12):1253-1262. PubMed ID: 31475382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1271-1301. PubMed ID: 29721845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Researchers' interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study.
    Shaw D; Satalkar P
    Account Res; 2018; 25(2):79-93. PubMed ID: 29291621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Promoting responsible conduct: striving for change rather than consensus. Commentary on "Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research" (F. Grinnell).
    Zigmond MJ
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):219-28. PubMed ID: 11657860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. NIH to review Emory in Darsee case.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1983 Jun; 220(4601):1029. PubMed ID: 11643994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Measuring consensus about scientific research norms.
    Berk RA; Korenman SG; Wenger NS
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jul; 6(3):315-40. PubMed ID: 11273458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.