These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28321798)

  • 1. Numerosity estimates for attended and unattended items in visual search.
    Kelley TD; Cassenti DN; Marusich LR; Ghirardelli TG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1336-1351. PubMed ID: 28321798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does constraining memory maintenance reduce visual search efficiency?
    Buttaccio DR; Lange ND; Thomas RP; Dougherty MR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):605-621. PubMed ID: 27967335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-modal attention modulates tactile subitizing but not tactile numerosity estimation.
    Tian Y; Chen L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 29549663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Underestimating numerosity of items in visual search tasks.
    Cassenti DN; Kelley TD; Ghirardelli TG
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):379-98. PubMed ID: 21162441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The contributions of visual and central attention to visual working memory.
    Souza AS; Oberauer K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):1897-1916. PubMed ID: 28600676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A role for spatial and nonspatial working memory processes in visual search.
    Anderson EJ; Mannan SK; Rees G; Sumner P; Kennard C
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(5):301-12. PubMed ID: 25116297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Kong L; Huang S; Yue Z; Wang S
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual and central attention share a capacity limitation when the demands for serial item selection in visual search are high.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):715-728. PubMed ID: 31974939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The aftermath of memory retrieval for recycling visual working memory representations.
    Park HB; Zhang W; Hyun JS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1393-1407. PubMed ID: 28378282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Amount and duration of attentional demands during visual search.
    Madden DJ; Allen PA
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jun; 45(6):577-85. PubMed ID: 2740199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
    Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numerosity underestimation with item similarity in dynamic visual display.
    Au RK; Watanabe K
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 23820026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection history alters attentional filter settings persistently and beyond top-down control.
    Kadel H; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):736-754. PubMed ID: 28169422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acute effects of nicotine on visual search tasks in young adult smokers.
    Rycroft N; Rusted JM; Hutton SB
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2005 Aug; 181(1):160-9. PubMed ID: 15778886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional reorienting triggers spatial asymmetries in a search task with cross-modal spatial cueing.
    Paladini RE; Diana L; Zito GA; Nyffeler T; Wyss P; Mosimann UP; Müri RM; Nef T; Cazzoli D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190677. PubMed ID: 29293637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.