204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28321893)
1. Dose-finding methods for Phase I clinical trials using pharmacokinetics in small populations.
Ursino M; Zohar S; Lentz F; Alberti C; Friede T; Stallard N; Comets E
Biom J; 2017 Jul; 59(4):804-825. PubMed ID: 28321893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. dfpk: An R-package for Bayesian dose-finding designs using pharmacokinetics (PK) for phase I clinical trials.
Toumazi A; Comets E; Alberti C; Friede T; Lentz F; Stallard N; Zohar S; Ursino M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Apr; 157():163-177. PubMed ID: 29477425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Competing designs for drug combination in phase I dose-finding clinical trials.
Riviere MK; Dubois F; Zohar S
Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 24464821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An extended Bayesian semi-mechanistic dose-finding design for phase I oncology trials using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information.
Yang C; Li Y
Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(4):689-705. PubMed ID: 38110304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An adaptive model switching approach for phase I dose-finding trials.
Daimon T; Zohar S
Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):225-32. PubMed ID: 23801550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hierarchical models for sharing information across populations in phase I dose-escalation studies.
Cunanan KM; Koopmeiners JS
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):3447-3459. PubMed ID: 28480828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Small-sample behavior of novel phase I cancer trial designs.
Oron AP; Hoff PD
Clin Trials; 2013 Feb; 10(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 23345304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian dose-finding phase I trial design incorporating pharmacokinetic assessment in the field of oncology.
Takeda K; Komatsu K; Morita S
Pharm Stat; 2018 Nov; 17(6):725-733. PubMed ID: 30066356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Towards using a full spectrum of early clinical trial data: a retrospective analysis to compare potential longitudinal categorical models for molecular targeted therapies in oncology.
Colin P; Micallef S; Delattre M; Mancini P; Parent E
Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(22):2999-3016. PubMed ID: 26059319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose-finding design driven by efficacy in onco-hematology phase I/II trials.
Seegers V; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M
Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1574-83. PubMed ID: 21394754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical trial simulations in paediatric oncology: A feasibility study from the Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer Consortium.
Janssen JM; Zwaan CM; Schellens JHM; Beijnen JH; Huitema ADR
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Nov; 85():78-85. PubMed ID: 28892776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.
Horton BJ; Wages NA; Conaway MR
Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 27435150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incorporating lower grade toxicity information into dose finding designs.
Iasonos A; Zohar S; O'Quigley J
Clin Trials; 2011 Aug; 8(4):370-9. PubMed ID: 21835856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revisiting the definition of dose-limiting toxicities in paediatric oncology phase I clinical trials: An analysis from the Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer Consortium.
Bautista F; Moreno L; Marshall L; Pearson ADJ; Geoerger B; Paoletti X
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Nov; 86():275-284. PubMed ID: 29055843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeated measures dose-finding design with time-trend detection in the presence of correlated toxicity data.
Yin J; Paoletti X; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar SJ
Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):611-620. PubMed ID: 28764555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adaptive dose-finding based on safety and feasibility in early-phase clinical trials of adoptive cell immunotherapy.
Wages NA; Fadul CE
Clin Trials; 2020 Apr; 17(2):157-165. PubMed ID: 31856602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A web application for evaluating Phase I methods using a non-parametric optimal benchmark.
Wages NA; Varhegyi N
Clin Trials; 2017 Oct; 14(5):553-557. PubMed ID: 28649874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A practical Bayesian design to identify the maximum tolerated dose contour for drug combination trials.
Zhang L; Yuan Y
Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(27):4924-4936. PubMed ID: 27580928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian dose regimen assessment in early phase oncology incorporating pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
Gerard E; Zohar S; Thai HT; Lorenzato C; Riviere MK; Ursino M
Biometrics; 2022 Mar; 78(1):300-312. PubMed ID: 33527351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Bayesian evaluation of enrolling additional patients at the maximum tolerated dose in Phase I trials.
Gönen M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Apr; 26(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 15837436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
