These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28322657)

  • 1. Data Quality in Electronic Health Records Research: Quality Domains and Assessment Methods.
    Feder SL
    West J Nurs Res; 2018 May; 40(5):753-766. PubMed ID: 28322657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of EHR data extractions for studies of preterm birth in a tertiary care center: guidelines for obtaining reliable data.
    Knake LA; Ahuja M; McDonald EL; Ryckman KK; Weathers N; Burstain T; Dagle JM; Murray JC; Nadkarni P
    BMC Pediatr; 2016 Apr; 16():59. PubMed ID: 27130217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors Influencing Data Quality in Electronic Health Record Systems in 50 Health Facilities in Rwanda and the Role of Clinical Alerts: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.
    Fraser HSF; Mugisha M; Bacher I; Ngenzi JL; Seebregts C; Umubyeyi A; Condo J
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2024 Jul; 10():e49127. PubMed ID: 38959048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review: electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: a review of the literature.
    Chan KS; Fowles JB; Weiner JP
    Med Care Res Rev; 2010 Oct; 67(5):503-27. PubMed ID: 20150441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Completeness, accuracy, and computability of National Quality Forum-specified eMeasures.
    Amster A; Jentzsch J; Pasupuleti H; Subramanian KG
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Mar; 22(2):409-16. PubMed ID: 25326598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the data completeness in the Electronic Health Record after the Implementation of an Outpatient Electronic Health Record.
    Soto M; Capurro D; Catalán S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():885. PubMed ID: 26262187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Electronic Health Records for Quality Measurement and Accountability in Care of the Seriously Ill: Opportunities and Challenges.
    Curtis JR; Sathitratanacheewin S; Starks H; Lee RY; Kross EK; Downey L; Sibley J; Lober W; Loggers ET; Fausto JA; Lindvall C; Engelberg RA
    J Palliat Med; 2018 Mar; 21(S2):S52-S60. PubMed ID: 29182487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nurse Managers' Experiences With Electronic Health Records in Quality Monitoring.
    Soriano R; Siegel EO; Kim TY; Catz S
    Nurs Adm Q; 2019; 43(3):222-229. PubMed ID: 31162341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of An Ontology for Characterizing Data Quality For a Secondary Use of EHR Data.
    Johnson SG; Speedie S; Simon G; Kumar V; Westra BL
    Appl Clin Inform; 2016; 7(1):69-88. PubMed ID: 27081408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initializing a hospital-wide data quality program. The AP-HP experience.
    Daniel C; Serre P; Orlova N; Bréant S; Paris N; Griffon N
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Nov; 181():104804. PubMed ID: 30497872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Better Data Quality for Better Healthcare Research Results - A Case Study.
    Hart R; Kuo MH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 234():161-166. PubMed ID: 28186034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a tool to measure user experience following electronic health record implementation.
    Xiao Y; Montgomery DC; Philpot LM; Barnes SA; Compton J; Kennerly D
    J Nurs Adm; 2014; 44(7/8):423-8. PubMed ID: 25072233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Reliability of Electronic Health Record Data Used for Obstetrical Research.
    Altman MR; Colorafi K; Daratha KB
    Appl Clin Inform; 2018 Jan; 9(1):156-162. PubMed ID: 29514352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Data Quality Ontology for the Secondary Use of EHR Data.
    Johnson SG; Speedie S; Simon G; Kumar V; Westra BL
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2015; 2015():1937-46. PubMed ID: 26958293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards augmenting structured EHR data: a comparison of manual chart review and patient self-report.
    Weiskopf NG; Cohen AM; Hannan J; Jarmon T; Dorr DA
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2019; 2019():903-912. PubMed ID: 32308887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Business Rules to Improve Secondary Data Use of Electronic Healthcare Systems.
    Blaisure J; Ceusters W
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 235():303-307. PubMed ID: 28423803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of Stroke Meaningful Use Measures in a National Electronic Health Record System.
    Phipps MS; Fahner J; Sager D; Coffing J; Maryfield B; Williams LS
    J Gen Intern Med; 2016 Apr; 31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):46-52. PubMed ID: 26951273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electronic Health Record (EHR) Abstraction.
    Alzu'bi AA; Watzlaf VJM; Sheridan P
    Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2021; 18(Spring):1g. PubMed ID: 34035788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Data quality of an electronic health record tool to support VA cardiac catheterization laboratory quality improvement: the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking System for Cath Labs (CART) program.
    Byrd JB; Vigen R; Plomondon ME; Rumsfeld JS; Box TL; Fihn SD; Maddox TM
    Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):434-40. PubMed ID: 23453115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors.
    Bossen C; Jensen LG; Udsen FW
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Oct; 82(10):940-53. PubMed ID: 23827768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.