These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28323076)

  • 1. Stepping back from 'persistence and relapse' to see the forest: Associative interference.
    Polack CW; Jozefowiez J; Miller RR
    Behav Processes; 2017 Aug; 141(Pt 1):128-136. PubMed ID: 28323076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhancement and reduction of associative retroactive cue interference by training in multiple contexts.
    Miguez G; Laborda MA; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2014 Dec; 42(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 25035103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cue-independent forgetting by intentional suppression - Evidence for inhibition as the mechanism of intentional forgetting.
    Wang Y; Cao Z; Zhu Z; Cai H; Wu Y
    Cognition; 2015 Oct; 143():31-5. PubMed ID: 26113446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Previously acquired cue-outcome structural knowledge guides new learning: Evidence from the retroactive-interference-between-cues effect.
    Luque D; Morís J; López FJ; Cobos PL
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Aug; 45(6):916-931. PubMed ID: 28405958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrospective revaluation of associative retroactive cue interference.
    Miguez G; Laborda MA; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2014 Mar; 42(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 24142799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The cost of learning: interference effects in memory development.
    Darby KP; Sloutsky VM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Apr; 144(2):410-31. PubMed ID: 25688907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reversing the relationship between a nontarget cue and the outcome facilitates subsequent human predictive learning.
    González G; Alcalá JA; Ogállar PM; Rosas JM; Callejas-Aguilera JE
    Behav Processes; 2021 Dec; 193():104529. PubMed ID: 34634384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Memory consequences of looking back to notice change: Retroactive and proactive facilitation.
    Jacoby LL; Wahlheim CN; Kelley CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1282-97. PubMed ID: 26010827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrieval-induced forgetting and interference between cues: training a cue-outcome association attenuates retrieval by alternative cues.
    Ortega-Castro N; Vadillo MA
    Behav Processes; 2013 Mar; 94():19-25. PubMed ID: 23201373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interference between cues of the same outcome in a non-causally framed scenario.
    Luque D; Morís J; Cobos PL; López FJ
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):328-32. PubMed ID: 19070656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learned biases in the processing of outcomes: A brief review of the outcome predictability effect.
    Griffiths O; Livesey E; Thorwart A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 30604992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of blocking on overt attention and associability in human learning.
    Beesley T; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 20718547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recovery of attention with renewal.
    Nelson JB; Craddock P; Molet M; Renaux C
    Learn Mem; 2017 Dec; 24(12):637-640. PubMed ID: 29142059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cues trained apart compete for behavioral control in rats: convergence with the associative interference literature.
    Escobar M; Matute H; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Mar; 130(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 11293462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age-related changes in overcoming proactive interference in associative memory: The role of PFC-mediated executive control processes at retrieval.
    Dulas MR; Duarte A
    Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():116-128. PubMed ID: 26879623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Associative status of the training context determines the effectiveness of compound extinction.
    Witnauer JE; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):52-65. PubMed ID: 22229586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of outcome inhibition in interference between outcomes: a contingency-learning analogue of retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Vadillo MA; Orgaz C; Luque D; Cobos PL; López FJ; Matute H
    Br J Psychol; 2013 May; 104(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 23560664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proactive interference and concurrent inhibitory processes do not differentially affect item and associative recognition: Implication for the age-related associative memory deficit.
    Guez J; Naveh-Benjamin M
    Memory; 2016 Sep; 24(8):1091-107. PubMed ID: 26230249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retroactive interference effects in implicit memory.
    Eakin DK; Smith R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1419-24. PubMed ID: 22329791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Associations compete directly in memory.
    Caplan JB; Rehani M; Andrews JC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 May; 67(5):955-78. PubMed ID: 24131316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.