465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28323455)
1. The Sleep of the Ring: Comparison of the ŌURA Sleep Tracker Against Polysomnography.
de Zambotti M; Rosas L; Colrain IM; Baker FC
Behav Sleep Med; 2019; 17(2):124-136. PubMed ID: 28323455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A validation study of Fitbit Charge 2™ compared with polysomnography in adults.
de Zambotti M; Goldstone A; Claudatos S; Colrain IM; Baker FC
Chronobiol Int; 2018 Apr; 35(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29235907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-Night Validation of a Sleep Tracking Ring in Adolescents Compared with a Research Actigraph and Polysomnography.
Chee NIYN; Ghorbani S; Golkashani HA; Leong RLF; Ong JL; Chee MWL
Nat Sci Sleep; 2021; 13():177-190. PubMed ID: 33623459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of a Consumer Sleep Wearable Device With Actigraphy and Polysomnography in Adolescents Across Sleep Opportunity Manipulations.
Lee XK; Chee NIYN; Ong JL; Teo TB; van Rijn E; Lo JC; Chee MWL
J Clin Sleep Med; 2019 Sep; 15(9):1337-1346. PubMed ID: 31538605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity and reliability of the Oura Ring Generation 3 (Gen3) with Oura sleep staging algorithm 2.0 (OSSA 2.0) when compared to multi-night ambulatory polysomnography: A validation study of 96 participants and 421,045 epochs.
Svensson T; Madhawa K; Nt H; Chung UI; Svensson AK
Sleep Med; 2024 Mar; 115():251-263. PubMed ID: 38382312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Commercial Wrist-Based and Smartphone Accelerometers, Actigraphy, and PSG in a Clinical Cohort of Children and Adolescents.
Toon E; Davey MJ; Hollis SL; Nixon GM; Horne RS; Biggs SN
J Clin Sleep Med; 2016 Mar; 12(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 26446248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of Fitbit Charge 3 against polysomnography in measuring sleep in adolescent boys and girls.
Menghini L; Yuksel D; Goldstone A; Baker FC; de Zambotti M
Chronobiol Int; 2021 Jul; 38(7):1010-1022. PubMed ID: 33792456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of Two Consumer Multisport Activity Tracker and One Accelerometer against Polysomnography for Measuring Sleep Parameters and Vital Data in a Laboratory Setting in Sleep Patients.
Budig M; Stoohs R; Keiner M
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(23):. PubMed ID: 36502241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of Sleep-Tracking Technology Compared with Polysomnography in Adolescents.
de Zambotti M; Baker FC; Colrain IM
Sleep; 2015 Sep; 38(9):1461-8. PubMed ID: 26158896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct comparison of two actigraphy devices with polysomnographically recorded naps in healthy young adults.
Cellini N; Buman MP; McDevitt EA; Ricker AA; Mednick SC
Chronobiol Int; 2013 Jun; 30(5):691-8. PubMed ID: 23721120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Actigraphy versus Polysomnography to Measure Sleep in Youth Treated for Craniopharyngioma.
Niel K; LaRosa KN; Klages KL; Merchant TE; Wise MS; Witcraft SM; Hancock D; Caples M; Mandrell BN; Crabtree VM
Behav Sleep Med; 2020; 18(5):589-597. PubMed ID: 31303059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of Fitbit Charge 2 Sleep and Heart Rate Estimates Against Polysomnographic Measures in Shift Workers: Naturalistic Study.
Stucky B; Clark I; Azza Y; Karlen W; Achermann P; Kleim B; Landolt HP
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Oct; 23(10):e26476. PubMed ID: 34609317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity, potential clinical utility, and comparison of consumer and research-grade activity trackers in Insomnia Disorder I: In-lab validation against polysomnography.
Kahawage P; Jumabhoy R; Hamill K; de Zambotti M; Drummond SPA
J Sleep Res; 2020 Feb; 29(1):e12931. PubMed ID: 31626361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of Fitbit Charge 4 for assessing sleep in Chinese patients with chronic insomnia: A comparison against polysomnography and actigraphy.
Dong X; Yang S; Guo Y; Lv P; Wang M; Li Y
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275287. PubMed ID: 36256631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detecting sleep using heart rate and motion data from multisensor consumer-grade wearables, relative to wrist actigraphy and polysomnography.
Roberts DM; Schade MM; Mathew GM; Gartenberg D; Buxton OM
Sleep; 2020 Jul; 43(7):. PubMed ID: 32215550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity of a commercial wearable sleep tracker in adult insomnia disorder patients and good sleepers.
Kang SG; Kang JM; Ko KP; Park SC; Mariani S; Weng J
J Psychosom Res; 2017 Jun; 97():38-44. PubMed ID: 28606497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a Commercial Accelerometer with Polysomnography and Actigraphy in Children and Adolescents.
Meltzer LJ; Hiruma LS; Avis K; Montgomery-Downs H; Valentin J
Sleep; 2015 Aug; 38(8):1323-30. PubMed ID: 26118555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selecting a sleep tracker from EEG-based, iteratively improved, low-cost multisensor, and actigraphy-only devices.
Ong JL; Golkashani HA; Ghorbani S; Wong KF; Chee NIYN; Willoughby AR; Chee MWL
Sleep Health; 2024 Feb; 10(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 38087674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors that may influence the classification of sleep-wake by wrist actigraphy: the MrOS Sleep Study.
Blackwell T; Ancoli-Israel S; Redline S; Stone KL;
J Clin Sleep Med; 2011 Aug; 7(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 21897772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Objective sleep in pregnant women: a comparison of actigraphy and polysomnography.
Zhu B; Calvo RS; Wu L; Simon L; Shah K; Piano M; Khain U; Izci-Balserak B
Sleep Health; 2018 Oct; 4(5):390-396. PubMed ID: 30241652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
